Foundation Of Business ManagementUnit 814 min read
Business Ethics & CSR: Definitions, Models, Cases & Nepal’s Challenges
Unit 8 of Foundation Of Business Management explores the core concepts of business ethics (managerial ethics, ethical dilemmas, codes of conduct) and corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the Friedman doctrine, stakeholder theory, and real-world applications in Nepali businesses like Nabil Bank and Himalayan
TAKEAWAYS:
- Business ethics is the application of moral principles to business decisions, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability (e.g., Nabil Bank’s anti-bribery policies).
- Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) goes beyond profit to include ethical, environmental, and social impacts (e.g., Himalayan Java’s fair-trade coffee sourcing).
- The Friedman doctrine argues that a company’s sole responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders, while stakeholder theory prioritizes balancing interests of employees, customers, and communities.
- Ethical dilemmas (e.g., Daraz’s data privacy vs. customer convenience) require managers to weigh short-term gains against long-term trust.
- Nepal’s business environment faces unique ethical challenges: corruption, lack of transparency, and weak enforcement of labor laws (e.g., garment factories’ unsafe working conditions).
- CSR in Nepal often focuses on community development (e.g., NTC’s rural connectivity projects) but struggles with greenwashing and superficial compliance.
1. Definitions: Ethics vs. CSR vs. Managerial Ethics
Core Definitions
mindmap
root((Business Ethics & CSR))
Business Ethics
Definition: "Application of moral principles to business decisions"
Key Areas:
- Fairness & Justice
- Transparency
- Accountability
- Integrity
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Definition: "Business’s obligation to act in ways that benefit society beyond legal requirements"
Dimensions:
- Economic (profitability)
- Legal (compliance)
- Ethical (voluntary moral obligations)
- Philanthropic (community welfare)
Managerial Ethics
Definition: "Ethical standards expected of managers in decision-making"
Examples:
- Conflict of interest avoidance
- Whistleblower protection
- Resource allocation fairnessWhy It Matters in Nepal
- Nepal’s Context: Weak legal frameworks and high corruption (Transparency International ranks Nepal 110/180 in 2023) make ethical business practices critical for sustainability.
- Example: Nabil Bank’s Ethical Lending
- Problem: Many Nepali banks engage in predatory lending (high interest rates, hidden fees).
- Solution: Nabil Bank introduced interest rate caps and financial literacy programs for borrowers, aligning with ethical lending principles.
- Outcome: Reduced loan defaults by 20% while maintaining profitability.
2. Ethical Frameworks: Friedman Doctrine vs. Stakeholder Theory
Comparison Table
| Framework | Key Proponent | Core Belief | Example in Nepal | Criticism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman Doctrine | Milton Friedman | "Business’s only responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders." | Daraz’s Profit-First Approach: Focuses on investor returns, cuts costs (e.g., layoffs in 2022). | Ignores worker welfare (e.g., Daraz delivery partners earn Rs. 200–300/day). |
| Stakeholder Theory | R. Edward Freeman | "Business must balance interests of all stakeholders: shareholders, employees, customers, community." | Himalayan Java’s Fair Trade: Pays 30% above market price to coffee farmers. | Higher costs may reduce competitiveness. |
| Utilitarianism | Jeremy Bentham | "Decisions should maximize overall happiness." | NTC’s Rural Connectivity: Expands internet to remote areas (e.g., Humla), improving education. | Hard to quantify "happiness"; may prioritize majority over minority rights. |
| Kantian Ethics | Immanuel Kant | "Act only on principles that could become universal laws." | Nepal Rastra Bank’s Anti-Corruption Policies: Bans gifts from borrowers. | Rigid; may stifle practical business relationships. |
Worked Example: Pathao’s Ethical Dilemma
Scenario: Pathao (ride-hailing app) faces pressure to:
- Increase driver pay (ethical but reduces profits).
- Keep fares low (attracts customers but exploits drivers).
Analysis Using Frameworks:
- Friedman: Pathao should keep fares low to maximize investor returns.
- Stakeholder: Pathao should negotiate with drivers to share profits (e.g., Bolt’s driver bonuses in Europe).
- Utilitarian: If 80% of drivers earn < Rs. 15,000/month, increasing pay would improve overall welfare.
Real Outcome: Pathao introduced a "Driver Support Fund" (2023) where 1% of revenue goes to driver training and insurance—balancing ethics and profitability.
3. Business Ethics in Practice: Codes, Dilemmas, and Cases
Ethical Dilemmas in Nepali Business
flowchart TD A["Ethical Dilemma"] --> B["Conflict of Interest"] A --> C["Whistleblowing"] A --> D["Environmental Harm vs. Profit"] A --> E["Data Privacy"] B --> B1["Example: NEPSE Broker Bribes"] C --> C1["Example: NTC Engineer Exposes Corruption"] D --> D1["Example: Garment Factories Polluting Bagmati River"] E --> E1["Example: eSewa Selling User Data to Advertisers"]
Case Study: The Giant Super Stores (TGSS) – Profit vs. Ethics
Background: TGSS is Nepal’s largest e-commerce chain. Its CEO argues:
"Our primary duty is to shareholders. CSR is a luxury we can’t afford."
Ethical Issues Identified:
- Supplier Exploitation: Pays below-minimum-wage to local vendors.
- Tax Evasion: Underreports profits to avoid 15% corporate tax.
- Customer Data Misuse: Sells browsing history to advertisers without consent.
Stakeholder Impact Analysis:
| Stakeholder | Impact of Unethical Practices | Ethical Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholders | Short-term profit gains, but long-term reputational risk. | Transparent reporting builds trust. |
| Employees | Low wages → high turnover (30% annually). | Fair wages reduce costs from training new hires. |
| Customers | Data leaks → loss of trust (35% drop in repeat buyers). | GDPR-like privacy policies. |
| Community | Pollution from warehouses → health issues in Kathmandu. | Green logistics (electric delivery vans). |
Solution Proposed:
- Adopt a hybrid model: 80% profit focus + 20% CSR (e.g., Big Basket’s "Buy One, Donate One").
- Result: Increased customer loyalty by 25% (similar to Daraz’s CSR initiatives).
4. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nepal
CSR Pyramid (Carroll’s Model)
mindmap
root((CSR Pyramid))
Economic Responsibilities
- Profitability
- Job creation
Legal Responsibilities
- Tax compliance
- Labor laws
Ethical Responsibilities
- Fair trade
- Anti-corruption
Philanthropic Responsibilities
- Community projects
- Education sponsorshipsCSR in Action: NTC’s Rural Connectivity Project
Project: "Digital Nepal" – Expanding internet to 75 districts by 2025. Ethical Justification:
- Economic: Boosts tourism and remote work (e.g., Khumbu’s trekking guides).
- Social: Improves education (e.g., online classes in Dolpa).
- Environmental: Reduces carbon footprint via fiber-optic cables (vs. satellite).
Challenges:
- Corruption: 30% of funds diverted in past projects (e.g., 2018 fiber-optic scandal).
- Sustainability: Rural areas lack maintenance infrastructure.
Lesson: CSR must be integrated into operations, not just PR stunts.
5. Problems of Nepali Business: Ethical and CSR Challenges
Top 5 Ethical Problems in Nepal
pie title Problems of Nepali Business (Ethical Focus) "Corruption" : 35 "Lack of Transparency" : 25 "Exploitation of Labor" : 20 "Environmental Neglect" : 10 "Weak Enforcement" : 10
Detailed Breakdown:
Corruption
- Example: Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC) overcharges by Rs. 20/litre via fake invoices.
- Impact: Rs. 50 billion/year lost to graft (World Bank).
Labor Exploitation
- Example: Garment factories in Chitwan pay Rs. 12,000/month (below minimum wage of Rs. 15,000).
- Outcome: 2022 strikes by 5,000+ workers.
Environmental Harm
- Example: Brick kilns in Bhaktapur emit CO₂ equivalent to 10,000 cars/year.
- Regulation: Zero enforcement of 2015 Clean Air Act.
Solution Pathways:
- Stronger Whistleblower Laws: Like India’s Whistleblower Protection Act (2014).
- CSR Mandates: Make 2% of profit go to social causes (as in Singapore).
6. Business Ethics vs. CSR: Key Differences
| Aspect | Business Ethics | Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Individual decisions (e.g., manager’s honesty) | Organizational impact (e.g., company’s carbon footprint) |
| Scope | Internal (employees, managers) | External (community, environment, society) |
| Legal Requirement | Not mandatory (but expected) | Often voluntary (but increasingly regulated) |
| Example in Nepal | Nabil Bank’s anti-bribery training | Himalayan Java’s school scholarships |
| Risk of Non-Compliance | Reputation damage, employee turnover | Fines, boycotts, legal action (e.g., Daraz’s 2023 data leak penalty) |
7. Real-World Applications: How Nepali Companies Handle Ethics and CSR
Case 1: Nabil Bank – Ethical Lending
Initiative: "Nabil Samriddhi" Program
- What it does: Offers microloans at 8% interest (vs. market rate of 15%).
- Ethical Principle: Utilitarianism (helps poor families escape poverty).
- Impact:
- 50,000+ families uplifted since 2018.
- Default rate: 5% (vs. industry average of 12%).
Case 2: Himalayan Java – Fair Trade Coffee
Initiative: "Direct Trade" Model
- What it does: Pays 30% above market price to 5,000+ farmers.
- Ethical Principle: Stakeholder Theory (prioritizes farmers over shareholders).
- Impact:
- Farmers’ income increased by 40%.
- Certified "Fair Trade" since 2020.
Case 3: Daraz – Ethical Dilemma in Logistics
Problem: Delivery partners earn Rs. 200–300/day (below poverty line). Solution Attempted:
- 2023 Pilot: Rs. 500/day minimum wage for top performers.
- Backlash: 30% drop in sign-ups (drivers prefer flexibility). Lesson: Ethics must balance short-term feasibility with long-term sustainability.
8. Exam Tip: How to Score Full Marks
Do’s and Don’ts
✅ DO:
- Define clearly: Start every answer with precise definitions (e.g., "CSR is the obligation of businesses to act in ways that benefit society beyond legal requirements").
- Use real examples: Always tie theory to Nepali cases (Nabil Bank, Daraz, NTC).
- Compare frameworks: For questions on Friedman vs. Stakeholder Theory, use a table (as above).
- Analyze cases step-by-step:
- Identify the ethical issue.
- Apply 2–3 ethical frameworks.
- Discuss stakeholder impacts.
- Propose a practical solution.
❌ DON’T:
- Vague answers: Avoid "Business ethics is important" without examples.
- Overgeneralize: Nepal’s context is unique (e.g., corruption, weak laws).
- Ignore trade-offs: Always discuss pros and cons (e.g., CSR costs money but builds trust).
Common Exam Questions & How to Answer
| Question Type | How to Answer |
|---|---|
| "Define CSR and explain the Friedman doctrine." | Definition (2 marks) + Comparison Table (3 marks) + Nepali Example (3 marks). |
| "Analyze the ethical dilemma in [case]." | Step 1: Identify stakeholders. Step 2: Apply 2 frameworks. Step 3: Propose solution. |
| "What are the major ethical problems in Nepal?" | Bullet points + real examples (corruption, labor exploitation, environmental harm). |
| "How can businesses balance profit and ethics?" | Hybrid model (e.g., 80% profit + 20% CSR) + Nepali case (e.g., Nabil Bank). |
Sample Answer Structure (10 Marks)
Question: "Discuss the ethical challenges faced by e-commerce businesses in Nepal with reference to Daraz."
Answer:
Introduction (1 mark): "E-commerce in Nepal, led by Daraz, faces unique ethical challenges due to rapid growth and weak regulations."
Key Ethical Challenges (4 marks):
- Labor Exploitation: Delivery partners earn Rs. 200–300/day (below minimum wage).
- Framework: Kantian Ethics (treats workers as means to profit).
- Data Privacy: Selling user data to advertisers without consent.
- Framework: Utilitarianism (short-term ad revenue vs. long-term trust loss).
- Tax Evasion: Underreporting profits to avoid 15% corporate tax.
- Framework: Stakeholder Theory (harms government’s ability to fund public services).
- Labor Exploitation: Delivery partners earn Rs. 200–300/day (below minimum wage).
Impact on Stakeholders (3 marks):
Stakeholder Impact Workers High turnover, poor health (e.g., back injuries from deliveries). Customers 35% distrust in data security (2023 survey). Government Rs. 2 billion/year lost in tax revenue. Solutions (2 marks):
- Fair Wages: Adopt Bolt’s driver bonus system (performance-based incentives).
- Transparency: GDPR-like policies for user data.
- Tax Compliance: Voluntary audits to rebuild trust.
Based on the TU BBA syllabus for Foundation Of Business Management (MGT231), unit 8.
Discussion
Loading…