Financial AccountingUnit 129 min read
Financial Analysis & Decision-Making: Tools, Ratios & Strategic Use
Unit 12 of Financial Accounting explores how to interpret financial statements, calculate key ratios (liquidity, profitability, leverage), and use accounting data for business decisions—with Nepali case studies, ratio analysis tables, and real-world applications in banks, eSewa, and NEPSE-listed firms.
Core Concepts & Definitions
Financial analysis is the process of evaluating businesses, projects, or financial statements to make informed decisions. It relies on:
- Historical data (past financial statements)
- Comparative analysis (trends over time or vs. competitors)
- Projections (future performance estimates)
Why is it essential?
mindmap
root((Why Financial Analysis?))
Decision-Making["Investors: Buy/Sell Stocks (NEPSE: Nabil, NMB)"]
Risk Assessment["Banks: Loan Approval (NMB, Global IME)"]
Performance Evaluation["Managers: Profitability of Branches (eSewa, Daraz)"]
Compliance["Regulators: NFRS Reporting (NTC, Ncell)"]
Stakeholder Communication["Shareholders: Dividend Decisions"]1. Types of Financial Analysis
A. Horizontal (Trend) Analysis
Compares financial data over multiple periods (e.g., 2078 vs. 2079). Example: Growth in eSewa’s revenue from Rs. 50B (2078) to Rs. 80B (2079). Formula:
B. Vertical (Common-Size) Analysis
Expresses each line item as a % of a base (e.g., sales for income statement, total assets for balance sheet). Example: If Daraz’s COGS was Rs. 400M in 2079 (sales = Rs. 1B), its COGS % = 40%. Table: Vertical Analysis of Kathmandu Retail Shop (2079)
| Particulars | Amount (Rs.) | % of Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sales | 5,000,000 | 100% |
| COGS | 3,500,000 | 70% |
| Gross Profit | 1,500,000 | 30% |
| Operating Expenses | 800,000 | 16% |
| Net Profit | 700,000 | 14% |
2. Key Financial Ratios
Ratios convert raw data into actionable insights. Categorized as:
A. Liquidity Ratios (Can the company pay short-term debts?)
| Ratio | Formula | Interpretation | Example (Nepali Bank) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | >1.5 = Healthy (e.g., NMB Bank: 1.8) | ||
| Quick Ratio | >1.0 = Strong liquidity (e.g., Global IME: 1.2) |
B. Profitability Ratios (Is the business making money?)
| Ratio | Formula | Example (Pathao vs. Daraz) |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | Pathao: 35% (high driver costs) | |
| Net Profit Margin | Daraz: 8% (competitive e-commerce) | |
| ROA (Return on Assets) | NEPSE-listed Nabil Bank: 5% |
Worked Example: Kathmandu Retail Shop’s Profitability
- Sales (2079): Rs. 5,000,000
- COGS: Rs. 3,500,000
- Operating Expenses: Rs. 800,000
- Net Profit: Rs. 700,000 Calculations: Insight: The shop’s gross margin is high, but operating costs (16% of sales) are squeezing net profit.
C. Leverage Ratios (How much debt is used?)
| Ratio | Formula | Example (NEPSE Firms) |
|---|---|---|
| Debt-to-Equity | Nabil Bank: 0.8 (safe) | |
| Interest Coverage | NMB: 4.5 (can cover interest 4.5x) |
3. DuPont Analysis (Breaking down ROE)
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Leverage Example: eSewa’s ROE (Simplified)
| Component | eSewa (2079) | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Net Profit Margin | 20% | |
| Asset Turnover | 1.5 | |
| Leverage (Equity Multiplier) | 2.0 | |
| ROE | 60% |
Insight: eSewa’s high ROE comes from efficient asset use (high turnover) and leverage.
4. Comparative Analysis
A. Industry Benchmarking
Compare ratios against industry averages (e.g., NEPSE’s FMCG vs. Banking). Table: Liquidity Comparison (2079)
| Company | Current Ratio | Quick Ratio | Industry Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMB Bank | 1.8 | 1.2 | Banking: 1.5 |
| Himalayan Coffee | 0.9 | 0.6 | FMCG: 1.2 |
Insight: Himalayan Coffee is illiquid (current ratio <1), risking cash flow issues.
B. Competitor Analysis
Example: Pathao vs. Daraz (Delivery Apps)
| Metric | Pathao | Daraz | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 35% | 8% | Pathao |
| Customer Acquisition Cost | High | Low | Daraz (economies of scale) |
5. Projections & Forecasting
A. Trend Analysis for Future Estimates
Example: NTC’s Revenue Growth (2077–2079)
| Year | Revenue (Rs. B) | Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2077 | 150 | — |
| 2078 | 180 | 20% |
| 2079 | 220 | 22% |
| Forecast (2080): Rs. 266B (assuming 20% growth). |
B. Break-Even Analysis
Example: Kathmandu Retail Shop
- Fixed Costs (Rent, Salaries): Rs. 200,000/year
- Variable Cost (COGS per unit): Rs. 100
- Selling Price per unit: Rs. 200 Break-Even Point (Units): Insight: The shop must sell 2,000 units/year to cover costs.
6. Limitations of Financial Analysis
| Limitation | Example |
|---|---|
| Historical Data | Past performance ≠ future results (e.g., NEPSE’s 2076 crash). |
| Qualitative Factors | Ignores brand reputation (e.g., Khalti’s trust vs. a new fintech). |
| Window Dressing | Companies manipulate ratios (e.g., delaying payments to improve current ratio). |
| Inflation | Rs. 1M in 2078 ≠ Rs. 1M in 2080 (Nepal’s 8% inflation). |
In the Real World
eSewa’s Decision-Making
- Ratio Used: Liquidity Ratios (Current Ratio = 1.6)
- How? Ensures eSewa can process Rs. 10B+ daily transactions without cash shortages.
NMB Bank’s Loan Approvals
- Ratio Used: Debt-to-Equity (<1.0 for safe loans)
- How? Rejects high-risk borrowers (e.g., startups with D/E > 2.0).
Daraz’s Inventory Management
- Ratio Used: Inventory Turnover = COGS / Avg. Inventory
- How? Daraz maintains turnover = 8 (sells inventory 8x/year) to avoid stockouts.
NEPSE Investors’ Stock Picks
- Ratio Used: P/E Ratio (Price-to-Earnings)
- Example: If Nabil Bank’s P/E = 12, investors compare it to industry avg. (10–15) to decide.
Exam Tip
What Examiners Want to See
✅ Clear ratio calculations (show formulas + plug in numbers). ✅ Real-world ties (e.g., "Like NMB Bank’s current ratio of 1.8, this company is liquid"). ✅ Comparative insights (e.g., "Unlike Pathao (35% margin), Daraz’s 8% shows lower profitability"). ✅ Limitations acknowledged (e.g., "While the current ratio is high, inventory aging may hide illiquidity").
Common Mistakes to Avoid
❌ Ignoring units (always label ratios as "times" or "%"). ❌ Mismatched years (compare 2078 vs. 2079, not 2078 vs. 2080). ❌ Overlooking qualitative factors (e.g., "High ROE could be due to aggressive debt, not efficiency").
Past Exam Patterns
- Short Questions (5 marks):
- Define horizontal analysis and calculate a 2-year trend.
- Explain why ROA is better than ROE for comparing firms.
- Long Questions (10–15 marks):
- Given trial balance + ratios, prepare adjusted financial statements.
- Analyze two companies’ performance using 5 ratios and suggest improvements.
flowchart TD
A["Financial Statements"] --> B["Horizontal Analysis"]
A --> C["Vertical Analysis"]
B --> D["Trend Identification"]
C --> E["Common-Size %"]
D & E --> F["Ratio Calculation"]
F --> G["Liquidity Ratios"]
F --> H["Profitability Ratios"]
F --> I["Leverage Ratios"]
G & H & I --> J["Comparative Analysis"]
J --> K["Decision-Making"]
K --> L["Loan Approval\n(Banks)"]
K --> M["Investment\n(NEPSE)"]
K --> N["Strategy\n(eSewa, Daraz)"]Based on the TU BBA syllabus for Financial Accounting (ACC201), unit 12.
Discussion
Loading…