Business Ethics and Corporate GovernanceUnit 17 min read
Business Ethics & Governance: Definitions, Linkages & Stakeholder Roles
Unit 1 of Business Ethics and Corporate Governance introduces core concepts—defining ethics vs. governance, their interrelationships, stakeholder theory, and Nepal’s regulatory landscape—with real-world applications from Ncell, Daraz, and Nabil Bank.
TAKEAWAYS:
- Business ethics are moral principles guiding decisions, while corporate governance is the system ensuring accountability—they overlap but serve distinct purposes.
- Stakeholder theory (Freeman) expands beyond shareholders to include employees, communities, and regulators, reshaping modern governance.
- Nepal’s Company Act 2063 and FNCCI’s Business Code of Conduct mandate transparency, but enforcement remains weak in family-owned firms.
- Real-world examples: Ncell’s ethical ad campaigns (Unit 5 link) and Daraz’s supplier audits (Unit 6 link) show governance in action.
- Exam focus: Compare definitions, contrast ethics/law, and analyze stakeholder roles—always use Nepali cases (e.g., NEPSE scandals, Chaudhary Group).
1. Definitions: Ethics vs. Governance
Core Definitions
mindmap
root((Business Ethics & Governance))
Ethics
"Moral principles guiding behavior"
"Influenced by culture, religion, law"
"Subjective: 'What is right?'"
Governance
"Structures/policies ensuring accountability"
"Objective: 'How to enforce rules?'"
"Legal + procedural frameworks"
Link
"Ethics informs governance; governance enforces ethics"
"Example: Ncell’s 'Digital Trust' policy (ethics) → compliance audits (governance)"Key Difference:
| Aspect | Business Ethics | Corporate Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | What should we do? (moral choices) | How do we ensure compliance? (systems) |
| Source | Personal/professional values | Laws, regulations, board policies |
| Enforcement | Self-regulation, culture | Audits, penalties, stakeholder pressure |
| Example | Nabil Bank’s "No Bribery" training | SEBON’s mandatory disclosures for NEPSE firms |
2. Why Ethics and Governance Matter
The Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984)
graph TD A["Stakeholders"] --> B["Primary"] A --> C["Secondary"] B --> B1["Shareholders"] B --> B2["Employees"] B --> B3["Customers"] B --> B4["Suppliers"] C --> C1["Government"] C --> C2["Community"] C --> C3["NGOs"] C --> C4["Media"]
Real-World Trace:
- Pathao’s Ethical Dilemma:
- Ethics: Should drivers earn a living wage (stakeholder: drivers) vs. profit margins (shareholders)?
- Governance: Pathao’s board sets fare algorithms (governance) but faces backlash when wages drop (ethics).
- Outcome: Nepal’s Transport Management Act 2074 now requires gig platforms to disclose driver earnings—governance enforcing ethics.
Nepal’s Context
- Family-Owned Businesses (70% of Nepal’s economy):
- Challenge: Blurred lines between personal and corporate ethics (e.g., Chaudhary Group’s tax disputes).
- Governance Gap: Only 30% of listed firms comply with SEBON’s stakeholder reporting (2023).
- Solution: FNCCI’s Business Code of Conduct (2061) mandates:
- Whistleblower protections.
- Environmental disclosures (e.g., Himalayan Java’s fair-trade coffee).
3. Ethical Decision-Making Models
The 4-Step Model (LaRue Hosmer)
flowchart TD A["1. Identify the Problem"] --> B["2. Gather Facts"] B --> C["3. Brainstorm Alternatives"] C --> D["4. Choose & Justify"] D --> E["5. Monitor Outcomes"]
Worked Example: NTC’s Tariff Hike (2023)
- Problem: NTC raised internet prices by 20%—ethical? (Stakeholders: students, businesses, government).
- Facts:
- Profit margin: 15% → 30% (governance: regulatory capture?).
- Alternative: Tax internet profits instead (ethical: progressive taxation).
- Choice: NTC justified hikes as "cost recovery" (governance: legal) but faced protests (ethics: public good).
- Outcome: Supreme Court intervened—governance (law) overrode ethics (profit motive).
4. Governance Frameworks: Global vs. Nepal
Comparison Table
| Framework | Key Features | Nepal’s Adaptation | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anglo-American (Shareholder) | Board independence, CEO accountability | Weak in family firms (e.g., CG Group) | NEPSE-listed companies |
| German (Stakeholder) | Banks + unions on boards | Rare; Nabil Bank has worker representatives | Nabil Bank’s "Stakeholder Council" |
| Japanese (Consensus) | Lifetime employment, cross-shareholding | Not applicable | — |
| OECD Principles | Transparency, accountability | Adopted in Company Act 2063 | SEBON’s disclosure rules |
5. Case Study: Daraz Nepal’s Ethical Supply Chain
Problem: Daraz sources from 1,000+ suppliers—how to ensure ethical labor? Solution:
- Ethics: Audits for child labor (aligned with UN Global Compact).
- Governance:
- Supplier Code of Conduct (mandatory).
- Blockchain tracking (transparency for NGO monitoring).
- Outcome:
- 2022: 80% suppliers compliant (up from 30% in 2020).
- Ethical Branding: "Made in Nepal" campaigns (marketing + governance).
6. Emerging Trends in Nepal
- ESG Reporting:
- NEPSE’s new rule: Listed firms must disclose Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) metrics.
- Example: Himalayan Java publishes carbon-footprint data.
- Digital Governance:
- eSewa’s Anti-Fraud AI: Uses ethics (user trust) + governance (KYC laws).
- Stakeholder Activism:
- Youth-led protests (e.g., against Ncell’s data leaks) force governance reforms.
Exam Tip
How to Score Full Marks:
- Definitions:
- Ethics: "Principles guiding right/wrong in business" (1 mark).
- Governance: "System of rules ensuring accountability" (1 mark).
- Comparisons:
- Use the table above for ethics vs. law/governance (3 marks).
- Nepal Focus:
- Always cite:
- Company Act 2063 (Section 110 on board duties).
- FNCCI Code 2061 (whistleblower clause).
- Real cases: NEPSE scandals, Chaudhary Group tax evasion.
- Always cite:
- Models:
- Draw Freeman’s stakeholder map or Hosmer’s decision flowchart (5 marks).
- Critical Analysis:
- Weakness in Nepal: "Family firms lack board independence" (link to Unit 10).
- Strength: "Nabil Bank’s stakeholder council" (link to Unit 7).
Avoid:
- Vague statements like "ethics is important" (0 marks).
- Ignoring Nepal-specific examples (examiners deduct for global-only answers).
Visual Summary:
classDiagram
class Ethics {
+Subjective
+Moral principles
}
class Governance {
+Objective
+Rules + enforcement
}
class Stakeholder {
+Shareholders
+Employees
+Community
}
Ethics --> Governance : "Informs"
Governance --> Stakeholder : "Serves"
Stakeholder --> Ethics : "Pressures"
note for Ethics "Example: Ncell’s ad ethics"
note for Governance "Example: SEBON audits"Based on the TU BBA syllabus for Business Ethics and Corporate Governance (MGT239), unit 1.
Discussion
Loading…