Introductory MacroeconomicsUnit 48 min read
Consumption, Saving, Investment: Functions, Graphs & Equilibrium
Unit 4 of Introductory Macroeconomics explores the consumption function (C = c₀ + c₁Yd), saving function (S = -c₀ + (1-c₁)Yd), and investment function (I = I₀ + bY), their graphical relationships, equilibrium conditions, and real-world applications in Nepal’s economy (e.g., remittance-driven consumption, bank loan inte
Key Definitions and Relationships
1. Consumption Function
The consumption function shows how household spending () depends on disposable income ():
- : Autonomous consumption (spending even if income = 0, e.g., basic needs).
- : Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC): (how much extra income is spent).
- Average Propensity to Consume (APC): .
In the Real World
eSewa & Khalti Apps
- Idea: Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
- How: When Nepalis receive remittances (e.g., Rs. 50,000/month), they spend ~60% on essentials (food, rent) and save 40%. The MPC ≈ 0.6 drives demand for digital payments, increasing app usage.
Daraz’s Inventory Investment
- Idea: Investment Function ().
- How: Daraz invests in stock (e.g., Rs. 2 billion/year) based on expected sales growth. If GDP grows 5%, Daraz’s inventory investment rises by , boosting warehouse jobs.
Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) Loan Interest
- Idea: Saving-Investment Equilibrium.
- How: If households save more (e.g., due to inflation fears), banks reduce loan rates to stimulate investment (e.g., NRB’s 2023 policy cut from 8% to 6% to boost business loans).
2. Saving Function
Derived from the consumption function:
- Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS): (how much extra income is saved).
- Average Propensity to Save (APS): .
WORKED EXAMPLE: Nepal’s Remittance Savings Assume:
- Disposable income (): Rs. 1,000 billion (2023 estimate).
- Autonomous consumption (): Rs. 200 billion (basic needs).
- MPC (): 0.7 (typical for Nepal).
Calculations:
| (Rs. bn) | APC () | APS () | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 900 | 100 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 1,200 | 1,040 | 160 | 0.867 | 0.133 |
INSIGHT: As income rises, APS increases (richer households save more).
3. Investment Function
Investment () depends on:
- Autonomous investment (): Business spending regardless of income (e.g., Daraz’s new warehouse).
- Induced investment (): Spending tied to income growth (e.g., Pathao’s bike purchases if ridership rises).
Equation:
- : Sensitivity of investment to income (e.g., means Rs. 100bn income → Rs. 10bn more investment).
4. Equilibrium: Saving = Investment
In a closed economy, equilibrium occurs when: Graphical Equilibrium:
WORKED EXAMPLE: Nepal’s 2023 Equilibrium Given:
Step 1: Find equilibrium where . Set :
Step 2: Calculate and at :
REAL TIE-IN: Nepal’s GDP in 2023 was ~Rs. 3,500 bn, but this simplified model ignores taxes/imports. The equilibrium shows how saving drives investment (e.g., NRB’s push for Rs. 500bn savings to fund infrastructure).
5. Determinants of Consumption, Saving, and Investment
Consumption Function Determinants
| Factor | Effect on Consumption () | Example in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Income | ↑ → ↑ | Remittances → ↑food/clothing spending |
| Wealth | ↑Wealth → ↑ | Stock market boom → ↑luxury goods |
| Expectations | Optimistic → ↑ | Election year → ↑durable goods |
| Interest Rates | ↑ → ↓ (more saving) | NRB hikes rates → ↓borrowed spending |
| Taxes | ↑Taxes → ↓ → ↓ | VAT increase → ↓consumer demand |
Saving Function Determinants
| Factor | Effect on Saving () | Example in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Income | ↑ → ↑ | Salaried class saves more than daily wage earners |
| Interest Rates | ↑ → ↑ | Bank FD rates at 8% → ↑deposits |
| Uncertainty | ↑Risk → ↑ | Political instability → ↑precautionary saving |
| Social Security | ↓Need to save → ↓ | Pension schemes → ↓household saving |
Investment Function Determinants
| Factor | Effect on Investment () | Example in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Expectations | ↑Expected profit → ↑ | Daraz expands warehouses if sales grow |
| Interest Rates | ↑ → ↓ (costly loans) | NRB cuts rates → ↑business loans |
| Technology | ↑Productivity → ↑ | AI chatbots → ↑tech startup investment |
| Government Policy | Subsidies → ↑ | NRB’s Rs. 100bn infrastructure fund → ↑construction |
6. Graphical Analysis: 3 Propositions of Psychological Law of Consumption
Keynes’ psychological law states:
- APC declines as income rises (poor spend almost all; rich save more).
- MPC is positive but < 1 (people spend less than extra income).
- MPS rises with income (rich save a larger % of extra income).
- APC curve: Starts high (near 1), slopes downward.
- MPC: Horizontal line at (e.g., 0.7).
- MPS: Horizontal line at (e.g., 0.3).
WORKED EXAMPLE: Kathmandu Traffic vs. Income
- Low-income driver (Rs. 20,000/month):
- Spends Rs. 18,000 on fuel/food → APC = 0.9.
- High-income driver (Rs. 200,000/month):
- Spends Rs. 150,000 → APC = 0.75. Why? Richer drivers save for electric cars (↓APC).
7. Multiplier Effect (Preview for Unit 5)
A change in autonomous investment () triggers a multiplier effect: Example: If (MPS = 0.2), a Rs. 100bn increase in leads to: Real-world: NRB’s Rs. 100bn infrastructure push (2023) could generate Rs. 500bn GDP if MPC = 0.8.
Exam Tip
- Graphs are 50% of marks: Always draw:
- Consumption curve (45° line + C = c₀ + c₁Y_d).
- Saving curve (below 45° line).
- Investment curve (intersecting saving at equilibrium).
- Memorize formulas:
- Equilibrium: →
- Determinants: Link to Nepal’s context (e.g., remittances ↑, NRB policy ↑).
- Numerical questions: Show all steps (e.g., solving for in equilibrium).
- Avoid common mistakes:
- Confusing MPC and MPS (MPC + MPS = 1).
- Forgetting autonomous terms (, ) in equations.
KEY VISUAL SUMMARY
Based on the TU BBM syllabus for Introductory Macroeconomics (ECO212), unit 4.
Discussion
Loading…