Financial ManagementUnit 1412 min read
Credit & Receivables: Terms, Risks & Optimization
Unit 14 of Financial Management covers credit policies, receivables management, trade credit analysis, and optimization techniques—with real-world Nepali business examples (e.g., Daraz, Ncell, Kathmandu retail shops) and visual tools like t-accounts, cash conversion cycle diagrams, and collection period calculations in
TAKEAWAYS:
- Credit policy (terms, period, discounts) directly impacts sales volume, collection risk, and working capital needs—measured via average collection period (ACP) and accounts receivable turnover.
- Trade credit cost (e.g., "2/10 net 30") can be converted to an annual percentage rate (APR) to compare with bank loans or other financing options.
- Cash conversion cycle (CCC) = inventory period + receivables period – payables period; optimizing receivables shortens CCC and frees up cash for growth.
- Credit scoring models (e.g., 5C analysis: Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, Conditions) help businesses like Ncell or Daraz assess customer risk before extending credit.
- Factoring (selling receivables to a third party like Nepal Investment Bank) improves liquidity but at a cost—always compare the factor’s fee to the opportunity cost of capital.
- Bad debt expense is recorded via the allowance method (contra-asset account) to match revenue with expenses, not when defaults occur.
1. Credit Policy: The Levers of Sales and Risk
Credit policy is the rulebook a business sets for selling goods/services on credit. It includes:
- Credit terms (e.g., "2/10 net 30" = 2% discount if paid in 10 days, else full amount due in 30 days).
- Credit period (how long customers get to pay).
- Credit standards (who qualifies for credit).
- Collection policy (how aggressively to chase overdue payments).
Why It Matters
- Too lenient? → High bad debts, tied-up cash, lower profitability.
- Too strict? → Lost sales, competitive disadvantage.
- Example: Daraz offers "Cash on Delivery (COD)" for small orders but requires pre-payment for high-value items to manage risk.
Key Metrics to Monitor
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts Receivable (AR) | (Credit Sales × ACP) / 360 | Higher AR = more cash tied up; risk of defaults. |
| Average Collection Period (ACP) | (AR / Credit Sales) × 360 | Days on average to collect payment. Ideal: ≤ credit period (e.g., 30 days). |
| Receivables Turnover | Credit Sales / AR | How many times AR is collected in a year. Higher = better liquidity. |
| Bad Debt Ratio | (Bad Debts / Credit Sales) × 100 | % of sales that turn into uncollectible debt. |
Worked Example: Beta Company’s AR Calculation
Problem: Beta Company sells on credit terms of net 30 (no discount). Its accounts are, on average, 40 days past due. Annual credit sales = Rs 18 million. Calculate Beta’s accounts receivable (AR).
Solution:
- Actual Collection Period (ACP) = Credit period + Average delay = 30 days + 40 days = 70 days.
- AR = (Credit Sales × ACP) / 360 = (Rs 18,000,000 × 70) / 360 = Rs 3,500,000.
Real-World Tie-In: If Beta is a Kathmandu-based retail shop selling on credit to wholesalers, Rs 3.5 million tied up in AR could instead be used to:
- Buy more inventory (increase sales).
- Pay suppliers early for discounts.
- Expand to new locations.
2. Trade Credit: The Hidden Cost of "Free" Financing
Trade credit is when suppliers (e.g., NTC for phone bills, Daraz for inventory) let you pay later. But is it really free?
Decoding Credit Terms: "2/10 net 30"
| Term | Meaning | Annualized Cost if Paid Late* |
|---|---|---|
| 2/10 net 30 | 2% discount if paid in 10 days; else full amount due in 30 days. | 36.7% |
| net 50 | No discount; payment due in 50 days. | 0% (but opportunity cost!) |
| 1/15 net 60 | 1% discount in 15 days; else due in 60 days. | 23.5% |
*Calculated as: (Discount % / (100 – Discount %) × (360 / Discount Period))
Worked Example: Kathmandu Biscuits Factory
Problem: Kathmandu Biscuits Factory buys flour on terms of 2/10 net 30. If it does not take the discount, what is the annual percentage cost (APC) of the trade credit?
Solution:
- Discount lost = 2% of invoice.
- Effective cost = (Discount % / (100 – Discount %)) × (360 / Discount Period) = (2 / 98) × (360 / 10) = 0.0204 × 36 = 73.46% per annum.
Real-World Tie-In: If Kathmandu Biscuits forgoes the discount, it’s paying 73.46% APR—higher than most bank loans! This is why Nepal Investment Bank (which offers factoring) charges ~12–18% for financing receivables—still cheaper than missing trade discounts.
3. Optimizing Receivables: The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)
The CCC measures how long cash is tied up in operations. Shorter CCC = more cash available for growth.
Formula:
CCC = Inventory Period + Receivables Period – Payables Period
Where:
- Inventory Period = (Average Inventory / COGS) × 360
- Receivables Period = (AR / Credit Sales) × 360
- Payables Period = (AP / COGS) × 360
Worked Example: Kathmandu Retail Shop
Given:
- Inventory turnover = 6 times/year → Inventory Period = 360 / 6 = 60 days.
- Receivables collection period = 70 days.
- Payables deferral period = 40 days.
- Annual sales = Rs 5 million.
Calculate CCC:
CCC = 60 (Inventory) + 70 (Receivables) – 40 (Payables) = **90 days**
Interpretation:
- Kathmandu’s cash is tied up for 90 days before it’s recycled.
- Actionable insights:
- Negotiate shorter payables (e.g., pay suppliers in 30 days instead of 40).
- Offer discounts for early payment (e.g., "1/10 net 30") to reduce receivables to 30 days → CCC = 60 + 30 – 40 = 50 days.
- Use factoring to sell receivables to Nepal Investment Bank and free up cash immediately.
flowchart TD
A["Cash"] -->|"- Inventory Period"| B["Inventory"]
B -->|"- Receivables Period"| C["Accounts Receivable"]
C -->|"- Payables Period"| D["Accounts Payable"]
D -->|"Cash Freed"| A4. Managing Credit Risk: Tools and Trade-offs
A. Credit Scoring: The 5C Analysis
Businesses like Ncell or Pathao use these criteria to assess creditworthiness:
| Criterion | What It Means | Example for a Kathmandu Wholesaler |
|---|---|---|
| Character | Customer’s reputation for paying bills on time. | Past 3 years of on-time payments to NTC. |
| Capacity | Ability to generate cash flows to repay. | Monthly sales of Rs 2M vs. Rs 500K expenses. |
| Capital | Net worth (assets – liabilities). | Owns shop worth Rs 5M; liabilities = Rs 2M. |
| Collateral | Assets pledged as security (e.g., warehouse, machinery). | Warehouse valued at Rs 3M. |
| Conditions | External factors (industry trends, economic outlook). | Demand for biscuits is rising (good). |
B. Collection Policies: Carrot vs. Stick
| Policy | Example | Risk/Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Discounts | "2/10 net 30" for early payment. | Reduces ACP but lowers profit margin. |
| Strict Terms | "Net 15" for new customers. | Lowers bad debts but may lose sales. |
| Factoring | Sell receivables to Nepal Investment Bank for 85% of value upfront. | Immediate cash but costly (~15–20%). |
| Legal Action | Sue for unpaid invoices (costly and time-consuming). | Last resort; damages relationships. |
5. The Accounting Cycle: Recording Credit Transactions
A. Journal Entries for Credit Sales and Bad Debts
| Transaction | Journal Entry |
|---|---|
| Credit Sale (Rs 100,000) | Dr. AR (Rs 100,000) <br> Cr. Sales Revenue (Rs 100,000) |
| Customer Pays Early (2% Discount) | Dr. Cash (Rs 98,000) <br> Dr. Discount Allowed (Rs 2,000) <br> Cr. AR (Rs 100,000) |
| Bad Debt Expense (Allowance Method) | Dr. Bad Debt Expense (Rs 5,000) <br> Cr. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (Rs 5,000) |
| Write-Off (Customer defaults) | Dr. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (Rs 3,000) <br> Cr. AR (Rs 3,000) |
B. T-Accounts: Tracking AR and Allowance
6. Real-World Applications in Nepal
A. eSewa and Khalti: Credit for Digital Payments
- Idea Used: Net credit period (time between service and payment).
- How It Works:
- eSewa lets users pay bills (e.g., NTC, Nepal Electricity Authority) after receiving the service.
- Risk: Fraud or non-payment (mitigated by KYC and transaction limits).
- Cost: eSewa charges a 1.5–2% fee on delayed payments (similar to trade credit cost).
B. Daraz: COD vs. Pre-Payment
- Idea Used: Credit terms optimization.
- How It Works:
- COD (Cash on Delivery): Acts like net 0 (customer pays immediately).
- Pre-payment: Acts like net 0 but reduces bad debts.
- Data-Driven Decision: Daraz uses past purchase history (like the 5C analysis) to decide COD eligibility.
C. Ncell: Post-Paid Plans as Trade Credit
- Idea Used: Extended credit period with collateral.
- How It Works:
- Ncell’s post-paid plans = 30–60 days of free credit.
- Collateral: Customer’s credit score and device value (e.g., iPhone as security).
- Cost: High default rates → Ncell charges higher interest (12–18% APR) on late payments.
Exam Tip: How This Unit Is Tested
Numerical Problems (50% of marks):
- Calculate AR, ACP, or CCC given sales and periods.
- Compute trade credit cost (APR) from terms like "2/10 net 30".
- Past Question Example:
"Delta Metal House changes credit terms from net 40 to net 50. ACP increases from 60 to 75 days. Annual sales = Rs 20M. Calculate the increase in AR." Solution: New AR = (20M × 75)/360 = Rs 4.17M; Old AR = (20M × 60)/360 = Rs 3.33M; Increase = Rs 0.84M.
Conceptual Questions (30% of marks):
- Define credit policy, factoring, or allowance method.
- Explain trade-offs (e.g., "Why might a firm prefer factoring over bank loans?").
- Common Pitfall: Forgetting to annualize trade credit costs (e.g., giving "2%" instead of "36.7%" APR).
Scenario-Based (20% of marks):
- Advise a Kathmandu retail shop on improving CCC.
- Compare COD vs. pre-payment for a Daraz-like business.
- Key Tip: Always tie answers to real Nepali examples (e.g., Ncell, eSewa, Daraz).
Final Mermaid Summary: The Credit Management Cycle
flowchart LR
A["Set Credit Policy\n(Terms, Standards, Discounts)"] --> B["Grant Credit\nto Customers"]
B --> C["Monitor ACP & AR\nvs. Policy"]
C -->|"If ACP > Terms"| D["Tighten Policy\nor Offer Discounts"]
C -->|"If Bad Debts Rise"| E["Use 5C Analysis\nor Factoring"]
C -->|"If CCC Too High"| F["Negotiate Payables\nor Improve Inventory"]
F --> ABased on the TU BBM syllabus for Financial Management (FIN207), unit 14.
Discussion
Loading…