Foundation Of Business ManagementUnit 113 min read
Business Management: Definitions, Environments & Stakeholders
Unit 1 of Foundation Of Business Management covers the core concepts of business management—its definition, objectives, organizational environments (internal/external), stakeholder analysis, and the Friedman doctrine of social responsibility—with real-world examples from Nepali and global companies.
TAKEAWAYS:
- Business management is the art and science of coordinating resources (human, financial, physical, and technological) to achieve organizational goals efficiently.
- The organizational environment consists of internal factors (culture, structure, processes) and external factors (economic, political, social, technological, legal, and environmental forces).
- Stakeholders (owners, employees, customers, government, society) influence and are influenced by business decisions, requiring a balanced approach to profitability and social responsibility.
- The Friedman doctrine argues that a company’s sole responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders, while critics advocate for corporate social responsibility (CSR).
- Nepal’s business challenges include political instability, infrastructure gaps, and cultural resistance to change, which affect planning and decision-making.
- Case analysis (e.g., TGSS e-commerce) shows how profitability vs. social expectations creates ethical dilemmas in real-world management.
1. Definition of Business Management
Business management is the process of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling resources to achieve predefined goals. It involves:
- Planning: Setting objectives and strategies.
- Organizing: Structuring resources (human, financial, physical).
- Leading: Motivating and directing employees.
- Controlling: Monitoring performance and correcting deviations.
Why it matters:
- Ensures efficiency (doing things right) and effectiveness (doing the right things).
- Helps businesses adapt to changes (e.g., Daraz adjusting to Nepal’s digital payment trends).
2. Objectives of Business Management
Businesses pursue economic and non-economic objectives:
| Economic Objectives | Non-Economic Objectives |
|---|---|
| Profit maximization | Social responsibility (e.g., Nabil Bank’s microfinance) |
| Growth & expansion | Employee welfare (e.g., Himalayan Java’s fair wages) |
| Customer satisfaction | Ethical business practices (e.g., Daraz’s refund policies) |
| Market share dominance | Environmental sustainability (e.g., Chaudhary Group’s green initiatives) |
Worked Example:
- NTC (Nepal Telecommunications Corporation) aims for profitability (economic) but also universal connectivity (non-economic), balancing stakeholder expectations.
3. Organizational Environment
The environment affects all business decisions. It is divided into:
A. Internal Environment (Controllable)
- Organizational culture (values, beliefs, norms).
- Structure (hierarchy, departments).
- Processes (workflows, decision-making).
- Human resources (skills, motivation).
Example:
- Pathao’s internal culture (flexible, tech-driven) helps it outperform traditional taxi services.
B. External Environment (Uncontrollable)
Divided into macro-environment (PESTEL) and micro-environment (competitors, suppliers, customers).
| Macro-Environment (PESTEL) | Micro-Environment |
|---|---|
| Political: Government policies (e.g., Nepal’s FDI laws) | Competitors: Daraz vs. Hamrobazaar |
| Economic: Inflation, unemployment | Suppliers: Raw material costs (e.g., wheat for Nabil Foods) |
| Social: Population growth, education | Customers: Buying power, preferences |
| Technological: AI, blockchain | Public: Media, NGOs (e.g., consumer rights groups) |
| Environmental: Pollution, sustainability | |
| Legal: Labor laws, tax regulations |
Real-World Trace:
- Nepal’s political instability (frequent government changes) forces businesses like Ncell to adapt quickly to policy shifts (e.g., telecom licensing).
4. Stakeholders in Business
Stakeholders are individuals/groups affected by or affecting the business. Classified as:
mindmap
root((Stakeholders))
Internal["1. Internal\n- Owners (Shareholders)\n- Employees\n- Managers"]
External["2. External\n- Customers\n- Suppliers\n- Government\n- Society\n- Competitors\n- Media"]
Primary["Primary (Direct Impact)\n- Owners, Employees, Customers, Suppliers"]
Secondary["Secondary (Indirect Impact)\n- Government, Society, Media"]Example:
- Khalti’s stakeholders:
- Primary: Users (customers), merchants, employees.
- Secondary: Government (regulations), banks (partners), media (public image).
Stakeholder Analysis for NEPSE (Nepal Stock Exchange):
| Stakeholder | Expectations | Impact on NEPSE |
|---|---|---|
| Investors | High returns, transparency | Demand for better governance |
| Government | Tax revenue, economic stability | Regulatory pressure (e.g., SEBON rules) |
| Listed Companies | Liquidity, investor confidence | Need for strong market performance |
| Public | Fair market, ethical practices | Reputation risk if scandals occur |
5. Friedman Doctrine vs. Social Responsibility
A. Friedman Doctrine (1970)
- Milton Friedman’s view: A company’s only responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders.
- Criticism: Ignores ethical obligations to society (e.g., pollution, exploitation).
B. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
- Businesses should balance profit with social welfare.
- Examples in Nepal:
- Nabil Bank: Microfinance for rural women.
- Chaudhary Group: CSR in education (scholarships).
- Daraz: Ethical sourcing from local suppliers.
Comparison Table:
| Aspect | Friedman Doctrine | CSR Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Profit maximization | Profit + Social Impact |
| Stakeholder Focus | Shareholders only | Shareholders + Society |
| Example (Nepal) | Private hospitals (profit-driven) | Himalayan Java (fair trade coffee) |
| Criticism | Exploitative, short-term gains | Higher costs, regulatory hurdles |
| Long-Term Benefit | Questionable (e.g., unethical firms collapse) | Sustainable reputation (e.g., Nabil Bank’s trust) |
Case Study: TGSS (The Giant Super Stores)
- Profit-driven approach: Focused solely on online sales growth, ignoring customer service complaints.
- Social responsibility approach: Could have invested in logistics (e.g., last-mile delivery) to reduce rural delivery delays, improving customer trust.
- Lesson: Balancing profit and ethics leads to long-term success.
6. Problems of Nepalese Business
Nepal’s business environment faces unique challenges:
Example:
- Daraz struggles with:
- Infrastructure: Delivery delays in remote areas (e.g., Mustang).
- Payment systems: Low digital literacy → cash-on-delivery dominance.
- Competition: Hamrobazaar and local shops undercutting prices.
7. Business Ethics
Definition: Principles guiding right vs. wrong behavior in business. Key Ethical Dilemmas in Nepal:
- Bribery: Common in government contracts (e.g., road construction tenders).
- False advertising: Some local businesses mislabel products (e.g., "organic" tea that isn’t).
- Exploitation: Low wages in garment factories (e.g., Kathmandu’s textile industry).
Ethical Frameworks:
| Framework | Description | Example in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Utilitarianism | Greatest good for the greatest number | NTC providing rural connectivity |
| Deontology | Duty-based ethics (rules matter) | Nabil Bank’s strict anti-corruption policies |
| Virtue Ethics | Moral character of decision-makers | Himalayan Java’s transparent supply chain |
Case Study: Kathmandu’s Traffic Chaos
- Unethical behavior: Overloading trucks, illegal parking.
- Ethical solution: Kathmandu Metropolitan City (KMC) could enforce strict traffic laws (e.g., fines for overloading), improving public health and business efficiency.
In the Real World
eSewa (Digital Payments)
- Idea Used: Stakeholder management (users, merchants, banks, government).
- How: eSewa balances profit (transaction fees) with social trust (secure payments, customer support). Its partnership with Nabil Bank ensures regulatory compliance while expanding reach.
Pathao (Ride-Hailing)
- Idea Used: Organizational environment (technological & social).
- How: Pathao leverages mobile tech (app-based booking) and social trends (youth preference for convenience) to dominate Nepal’s ride-sharing market, adapting to competition from local taxis.
Nabil Bank (Microfinance)
- Idea Used: Social responsibility vs. profit.
- How: Nabil Bank’s microfinance loans (e.g., for women entrepreneurs) align with CSR while generating long-term profitability through financial inclusion.
Exam Tip
Definitions: Memorize key terms (management, stakeholders, Friedman doctrine) word-for-word—exams often test exact definitions.
- Example: "Management is the process of working with and through others to achieve organizational objectives efficiently and effectively."
Case Analysis:
- For TGSS or similar cases, structure your answer as:
- Problem identification (e.g., "TGSS ignored customer complaints").
- Stakeholder impact (e.g., "Customers switched to Hamrobazaar").
- Solution (e.g., "Implement CSR by improving logistics").
- Use real examples (e.g., "Like Nabil Bank’s microfinance, TGSS could invest in rural delivery hubs").
- For TGSS or similar cases, structure your answer as:
Diagrams & Tables:
- Draw PESTEL or stakeholder maps in exams—they add marks and show understanding.
- Compare Friedman vs. CSR in a table (as above) to score high in analytical questions.
Nepal-Specific Answers:
- Examiners love context. Link theories to Nepal’s challenges (e.g., "Political instability, like in Pathao’s expansion, requires contingency planning").
- Mention local companies (Ncell, Daraz, Nabil Bank) to stand out.
Common Pitfalls:
- ❌ Vague answers: Avoid "Businesses should be ethical" → Explain how (e.g., "Like Himalayan Java’s fair-trade model").
- ❌ Ignoring trade-offs: If asked about profit vs. ethics, discuss both sides (e.g., "While CSR increases costs, it builds long-term trust like Nabil Bank’s microfinance").
Based on the TU BITM syllabus for Foundation Of Business Management (MGT231), unit 1.
Discussion
Loading…