MGT231 Foundation Of Business Management

Foundation Of Business ManagementUnit 113 min read

Business Management: Definitions, Environments & Stakeholders

Unit 1 of Foundation Of Business Management covers the core concepts of business management—its definition, objectives, organizational environments (internal/external), stakeholder analysis, and the Friedman doctrine of social responsibility—with real-world examples from Nepali and global companies.

TAKEAWAYS:

  • Business management is the art and science of coordinating resources (human, financial, physical, and technological) to achieve organizational goals efficiently.
  • The organizational environment consists of internal factors (culture, structure, processes) and external factors (economic, political, social, technological, legal, and environmental forces).
  • Stakeholders (owners, employees, customers, government, society) influence and are influenced by business decisions, requiring a balanced approach to profitability and social responsibility.
  • The Friedman doctrine argues that a company’s sole responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders, while critics advocate for corporate social responsibility (CSR).
  • Nepal’s business challenges include political instability, infrastructure gaps, and cultural resistance to change, which affect planning and decision-making.
  • Case analysis (e.g., TGSS e-commerce) shows how profitability vs. social expectations creates ethical dilemmas in real-world management.

1. Definition of Business Management

Business management is the process of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling resources to achieve predefined goals. It involves:

  • Planning: Setting objectives and strategies.
  • Organizing: Structuring resources (human, financial, physical).
  • Leading: Motivating and directing employees.
  • Controlling: Monitoring performance and correcting deviations.
Goals & StrategiesSWOT Analysis (if mentioned)1. PlanningHuman ResourcesFinancial ResourcesPhysical Resources2. OrganizingMotivation TechniquesLeadership Styles3. LeadingPerformance MetricsCorrective Actions4. ControllingBusiness Management
Hierarchical breakdown of the 4 functions of business management

Why it matters:

  • Ensures efficiency (doing things right) and effectiveness (doing the right things).
  • Helps businesses adapt to changes (e.g., Daraz adjusting to Nepal’s digital payment trends).

2. Objectives of Business Management

Businesses pursue economic and non-economic objectives:

Economic Objectives Non-Economic Objectives
Profit maximization Social responsibility (e.g., Nabil Bank’s microfinance)
Growth & expansion Employee welfare (e.g., Himalayan Java’s fair wages)
Customer satisfaction Ethical business practices (e.g., Daraz’s refund policies)
Market share dominance Environmental sustainability (e.g., Chaudhary Group’s green initiatives)

Worked Example:

  • NTC (Nepal Telecommunications Corporation) aims for profitability (economic) but also universal connectivity (non-economic), balancing stakeholder expectations.

3. Organizational Environment

The environment affects all business decisions. It is divided into:

ControllabilityImpact on BusinessOInternal FactorsExternal FactorsBusiness ImpactBalance PointOptimal Performance
Interplay between controllable internal and uncontrollable external factors

A. Internal Environment (Controllable)

  • Organizational culture (values, beliefs, norms).
  • Structure (hierarchy, departments).
  • Processes (workflows, decision-making).
  • Human resources (skills, motivation).
Organizational Culture (Values & Beliefs)Structure (Hierarchy & Departments)Processes (Workflows & Decision-Making)Human Resources (Skills & Motivation)A. Internal Environment (Controllable)Economic (Inflation, GDP)Political (Laws, Stability)Social (Demographics, Trends)Technological (Innovation, Digitalization)Legal (Regulations, Compliance)Environmental (Sustainability, Climate)B. External Environment (Uncontrollable)Organizational Environment
Comparison of controllable (internal) vs. uncontrollable (external) business environments

Example:

  • Pathao’s internal culture (flexible, tech-driven) helps it outperform traditional taxi services.

B. External Environment (Uncontrollable)

Divided into macro-environment (PESTEL) and micro-environment (competitors, suppliers, customers).

Macro-Environment (PESTEL) Micro-Environment
Political: Government policies (e.g., Nepal’s FDI laws) Competitors: Daraz vs. Hamrobazaar
Economic: Inflation, unemployment Suppliers: Raw material costs (e.g., wheat for Nabil Foods)
Social: Population growth, education Customers: Buying power, preferences
Technological: AI, blockchain Public: Media, NGOs (e.g., consumer rights groups)
Environmental: Pollution, sustainability
Legal: Labor laws, tax regulations

Real-World Trace:

  • Nepal’s political instability (frequent government changes) forces businesses like Ncell to adapt quickly to policy shifts (e.g., telecom licensing).

4. Stakeholders in Business

Stakeholders are individuals/groups affected by or affecting the business. Classified as:

mindmap
  root((Stakeholders))
    Internal["1. Internal\n- Owners (Shareholders)\n- Employees\n- Managers"]
    External["2. External\n- Customers\n- Suppliers\n- Government\n- Society\n- Competitors\n- Media"]
    Primary["Primary (Direct Impact)\n- Owners, Employees, Customers, Suppliers"]
    Secondary["Secondary (Indirect Impact)\n- Government, Society, Media"]

Example:

  • Khalti’s stakeholders:
    • Primary: Users (customers), merchants, employees.
    • Secondary: Government (regulations), banks (partners), media (public image).

Stakeholder Analysis for NEPSE (Nepal Stock Exchange):

Stakeholder Expectations Impact on NEPSE
Investors High returns, transparency Demand for better governance
Government Tax revenue, economic stability Regulatory pressure (e.g., SEBON rules)
Listed Companies Liquidity, investor confidence Need for strong market performance
Public Fair market, ethical practices Reputation risk if scandals occur

5. Friedman Doctrine vs. Social Responsibility

1970 BSMilton Friedmanpublishes 'The Social 2000 BSGlobal rise of CSRmovements2020 BSNepal's first CSRAct (2075)
Key milestones in the CSR debate

A. Friedman Doctrine (1970)

  • Milton Friedman’s view: A company’s only responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders.
  • Criticism: Ignores ethical obligations to society (e.g., pollution, exploitation).

B. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

  • Businesses should balance profit with social welfare.
  • Examples in Nepal:
    • Nabil Bank: Microfinance for rural women.
    • Chaudhary Group: CSR in education (scholarships).
    • Daraz: Ethical sourcing from local suppliers.

Comparison Table:

Aspect Friedman Doctrine CSR Approach
Primary Goal Profit maximization Profit + Social Impact
Stakeholder Focus Shareholders only Shareholders + Society
Example (Nepal) Private hospitals (profit-driven) Himalayan Java (fair trade coffee)
Criticism Exploitative, short-term gains Higher costs, regulatory hurdles
Long-Term Benefit Questionable (e.g., unethical firms collapse) Sustainable reputation (e.g., Nabil Bank’s trust)

Case Study: TGSS (The Giant Super Stores)

  • Profit-driven approach: Focused solely on online sales growth, ignoring customer service complaints.
  • Social responsibility approach: Could have invested in logistics (e.g., last-mile delivery) to reduce rural delivery delays, improving customer trust.
  • Lesson: Balancing profit and ethics leads to long-term success.

6. Problems of Nepalese Business

Nepal’s business environment faces unique challenges:

02.254.56.759Political Instability8Economic Challenges9Infrastructure Gaps7Cultural Resistance6Legal Hurdles8Global Competition5
Severity of Nepalese business challenges (1-10 scale, based on expert consensus)

Example:

  • Daraz struggles with:
    • Infrastructure: Delivery delays in remote areas (e.g., Mustang).
    • Payment systems: Low digital literacy → cash-on-delivery dominance.
    • Competition: Hamrobazaar and local shops undercutting prices.

7. Business Ethics

Definition: Principles guiding right vs. wrong behavior in business. Key Ethical Dilemmas in Nepal:

  • Bribery: Common in government contracts (e.g., road construction tenders).
  • False advertising: Some local businesses mislabel products (e.g., "organic" tea that isn’t).
  • Exploitation: Low wages in garment factories (e.g., Kathmandu’s textile industry).

Ethical Frameworks:

Framework Description Example in Nepal
Utilitarianism Greatest good for the greatest number NTC providing rural connectivity
Deontology Duty-based ethics (rules matter) Nabil Bank’s strict anti-corruption policies
Virtue Ethics Moral character of decision-makers Himalayan Java’s transparent supply chain

Case Study: Kathmandu’s Traffic Chaos

  • Unethical behavior: Overloading trucks, illegal parking.
  • Ethical solution: Kathmandu Metropolitan City (KMC) could enforce strict traffic laws (e.g., fines for overloading), improving public health and business efficiency.

In the Real World

  1. eSewa (Digital Payments)

    • Idea Used: Stakeholder management (users, merchants, banks, government).
    • How: eSewa balances profit (transaction fees) with social trust (secure payments, customer support). Its partnership with Nabil Bank ensures regulatory compliance while expanding reach.
  2. Pathao (Ride-Hailing)

    • Idea Used: Organizational environment (technological & social).
    • How: Pathao leverages mobile tech (app-based booking) and social trends (youth preference for convenience) to dominate Nepal’s ride-sharing market, adapting to competition from local taxis.
  3. Nabil Bank (Microfinance)

    • Idea Used: Social responsibility vs. profit.
    • How: Nabil Bank’s microfinance loans (e.g., for women entrepreneurs) align with CSR while generating long-term profitability through financial inclusion.

Exam Tip

  1. Definitions: Memorize key terms (management, stakeholders, Friedman doctrine) word-for-word—exams often test exact definitions.

    • Example: "Management is the process of working with and through others to achieve organizational objectives efficiently and effectively."
  2. Case Analysis:

    • For TGSS or similar cases, structure your answer as:
      1. Problem identification (e.g., "TGSS ignored customer complaints").
      2. Stakeholder impact (e.g., "Customers switched to Hamrobazaar").
      3. Solution (e.g., "Implement CSR by improving logistics").
    • Use real examples (e.g., "Like Nabil Bank’s microfinance, TGSS could invest in rural delivery hubs").
  3. Diagrams & Tables:

    • Draw PESTEL or stakeholder maps in exams—they add marks and show understanding.
    • Compare Friedman vs. CSR in a table (as above) to score high in analytical questions.
  4. Nepal-Specific Answers:

    • Examiners love context. Link theories to Nepal’s challenges (e.g., "Political instability, like in Pathao’s expansion, requires contingency planning").
    • Mention local companies (Ncell, Daraz, Nabil Bank) to stand out.
  5. Common Pitfalls:

    • ❌ Vague answers: Avoid "Businesses should be ethical" → Explain how (e.g., "Like Himalayan Java’s fair-trade model").
    • ❌ Ignoring trade-offs: If asked about profit vs. ethics, discuss both sides (e.g., "While CSR increases costs, it builds long-term trust like Nabil Bank’s microfinance").

Based on the TU BITM syllabus for Foundation Of Business Management (MGT231), unit 1.

Discussion

Loading…