International Financial Environment: Exchange Rates, Risk, and IB Strategies

TAKEAWAYS:

• Exchange rates (fixed vs. floating) directly impact import/export costs and profit margins for Nepali exporters like Himalayan Java.
• Foreign Exchange (FX) risk (transaction, translation, economic) forces companies like NTC to hedge currency fluctuations when buying international equipment.
• International financial institutions (IMF, World Bank) provide loans and policies that either stabilize or destabilize emerging markets like Nepal’s.
• Capital flows (FDI, portfolio investment) determine whether Nepali startups (e.g., Pathao) attract foreign funding or face liquidity crises.
• Interest rate parity and purchasing power parity explain why Daraz’s global pricing differs across countries.
• Regulatory environments (e.g., Nepal Rastra Bank’s FX controls) either facilitate or restrict cross-border transactions for banks like Nabil.

---

1. Introduction to the International Financial Environment

The international financial environment consists of exchange rates, financial markets, institutions, and regulations that influence how businesses conduct trade, invest, and manage risks across borders. For Nepal, this includes:

• Exchange rate volatility affecting imports (e.g., fuel, machinery) and remittances.
• Capital controls by Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) on FX transactions.
• Global financial crises (e.g., 2008, COVID-19) disrupting supply chains (e.g., Daraz’s inventory management).

Why it matters for Nepal:

• NEPSE (Nepal Stock Exchange): Stock prices fluctuate with global oil prices (denominated in USD), affecting investor confidence.
• eSewa/Khalti: Digital payments face FX risks when converting USD to NPR for international transactions.
• Ncell/NTC: Buying foreign telecom equipment exposes them to FX risk if payments are delayed.

---

2. Exchange Rate Systems

Exchange rates determine the value of one currency relative to another. Two main systems:

A. Fixed Exchange Rate System

• Definition: Government sets and maintains a fixed rate (e.g., pegging NPR to USD at 1 USD = 110 NPR).
• How it works:
  • Central bank intervenes to buy/sell currency to stabilize the rate.
  • Example: China’s yuan peg to USD (until 2005).
• Advantages:
  • Stability for exporters/importers (predictable costs).
  • Attracts foreign investment (e.g., Hong Kong’s fixed rate).
• Disadvantages:
  • Loss of monetary independence (NRB cannot adjust interest rates freely).
  • Reserve depletion if demand for foreign currency rises (e.g., Nepal’s 2022 fuel import crisis).
• Nepal’s case:
  • NRB occasionally intervenes to stabilize NPR/USD, but Nepal uses a managed float (not pure fixed).

B. Floating Exchange Rate System

• Definition: Market forces (supply/demand) determine the exchange rate.
• How it works:
  • Clean float: No government intervention (e.g., USD, EUR).
  • Dirty float (managed float): Central bank occasionally intervenes (e.g., NPR since 2002).
• Advantages:
  • Automatic adjustment to balance of payments (e.g., if Nepal imports more, NPR depreciates).
  • Monetary policy flexibility (NRB can adjust interest rates independently).
• Disadvantages:
  • Volatility harms businesses (e.g., Daraz’s supplier costs in USD rise if NPR weakens).
  • Speculation risk (e.g., 2015 NPR crash due to capital outflows).

Visual: Exchange Rate Systems

---

3. Foreign Exchange (FX) Markets

Where currencies are traded. Key participants:

• Commercial banks (e.g., Global IME, Nabil Bank).
• Central banks (NRB, Federal Reserve).
• Corporations (NTC buying routers from Cisco).
• Hedge funds (speculating on NPR/USD).

How it works:

1. Spot market: Immediate exchange (e.g., NTC buys USD today for equipment).
2. Forward market: Future exchange (e.g., Daraz locks in USD/NPR rate 6 months ahead).
3. Swap market: Borrow in one currency, lend in another (e.g., a Nepali exporter borrows USD, lends NPR).

Worked Example: NTC’s FX Risk

• Scenario: NTC buys 1 million USD worth of telecom equipment from Ericsson (Sweden).
• Risk: If NPR depreciates by 10% (1 USD = 120 NPR → 132 NPR), NTC pays 20% more in NPR.
• Solution: NTC enters a forward contract to buy USD at today’s rate (1 USD = 110 NPR) in 6 months.

---

4. Foreign Exchange Risks in International Business

Three types of risk affect Nepali firms:

A. Transaction Exposure

• Definition: Risk from unsettled foreign currency transactions (e.g., invoices, loans).
• Example: Himalayan Java sells coffee to a UK importer but hasn’t converted GBP to NPR yet. If GBP strengthens, the NPR value of the sale drops.
• Mitigation:
  • Forward contracts (lock in rate).
  • Currency hedging (e.g., Nabil Bank’s FX options).

B. Translation Exposure

• Definition: Risk from revaluing foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements in home currency.
• Example: NEPSE-listed Ncell has assets in USD. If USD strengthens, Ncell’s reported profit in NPR looks lower.
• Mitigation:
  • Net investment hedging (NRB allows limited hedging for listed firms).

C. Economic Exposure

• Definition: Long-term risk from currency changes affecting competitiveness.
• Example: If NPR weakens, Daraz’s Nepali suppliers become more expensive for foreign buyers, reducing demand.
• Mitigation:
  • Diversify supply chains (e.g., Daraz sources from India and Nepal).
  • Price adjustments (e.g., Daraz raises prices in NPR but keeps USD prices stable).

Visual: FX Risk Types

---

5. International Financial Institutions

Global bodies that influence Nepal’s financial environment:

Case Study: IMF and Nepal (2020 Loan)

• Problem: COVID-19 caused remittance drops (from USD to NPR) and tourism collapse.
• IMF Solution: Provided $500 million under the Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI).
• Conditions:
  • NRB had to defend NPR (buy USD to prevent collapse).
  • Nepal had to reduce fiscal deficit (cut subsidies).
• Result: NPR stabilized, but inflation rose due to higher fuel prices.

---

6. Capital Flows and International Investment

Money moving across borders affects Nepal’s economy:

A. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

• Definition: Long-term investment in business (e.g., setting up a factory).
• Example: Daraz’s acquisition of Sastodeal (2017) brought $100M+ in FDI.
• Benefits for Nepal:
  • Job creation (e.g., Pathao’s ride-hailing drivers).
  • Technology transfer (e.g., Daraz’s logistics software).
• Challenges:
  • Repatriation risks: If Daraz exits Nepal, jobs may vanish.
  • Tax disputes: Nepal and Alibaba (Daraz’s parent) argued over tax liabilities.

B. Portfolio Investment

• Definition: Short-term investments (stocks, bonds) by foreigners.
• Example: Nepali stocks (NEPSE) attract Indian and Gulf investors due to high returns.
• Risk: Sudden capital outflows (e.g., 2015 NPR crash) can destabilize the market.

C. Hot Money

• Definition: Short-term speculative capital (e.g., hedge funds).
• Example: In 2015, hot money flowed out of Nepal due to political uncertainty, causing NPR to crash by 15%.

Visual: Capital Flows in Nepal

---

7. Interest Rate Parity and Purchasing Power Parity

Theories explaining currency movements:

A. Interest Rate Parity (IRP)

• Definition: If two countries have different interest rates, their currencies will adjust to reflect the risk-free rate difference.
• Formula: $$i_{USD}-i_{NPR}=(E_e-E_0)/E_0$$ Where:
  • $i_{USD}$ = USD interest rate
  • $i_{NPR}$ = NPR interest rate
  • $E_0$ = Spot exchange rate (today)
  • $E_e$ = Forward exchange rate (future)
• Example:
  • If NRB cuts interest rates (e.g., 6% → 4%), NPR may depreciate to attract foreign capital.
  • Impact on Nepal: Lower rates encourage FDI but hurt savers (e.g., pensioners).

B. Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

• Definition: Long-term, exchange rates adjust to equalize the price of a basket of goods across countries.
• Example:
  • If a Big Mac costs $5 USD in the US and 550 NPR in Nepal, PPP suggests 1 USD ≈ 110 NPR.
  • If NPR weakens to 1 USD = 130 NPR, Nepali consumers can buy a cheaper Big Mac relative to USD earners.
• Criticism: Doesn’t account for non-tradable goods (e.g., rent, healthcare).

Worked Example: PPP and Daraz’s Pricing

• Scenario: Daraz sells a laptop for $800 USD in the US and 88,000 NPR in Nepal.
• PPP Check:
  • If PPP is 1 USD = 110 NPR, the laptop should cost $800 × 110 = 88,000 NPR (matches Daraz’s price).
  • But if NPR weakens to 1 USD = 130 NPR, Daraz could raise NPR price to 104,000 NPR without increasing USD price.

---

8. International Financial Regulations

Governments and institutions set rules to manage risks:

A. Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) Regulations

• FX Controls:
  • Remittance limits: Nepali workers abroad can send up to $20,000/month (2023 rule).
  • Capital repatriation: FDI profits can be repatriated only after 5 years (for some sectors).
• Interest Rate Controls:
  • NRB sets minimum lending rates (e.g., 10% for commercial loans).
• Example: Nabil Bank’s FX hedging must comply with NRB’s Foreign Exchange Management Regulations (2019).

B. Basel III (Global Banking Standards)

• Definition: Rules for bank capital and liquidity (adopted by Nepal in 2018).
• Impact on Nepal:
  • Banks like Global IME must hold more reserves for FX risk.
  • Stricter loan-to-deposit ratios reduce risk but limit lending.

Comparison Table: Nepal vs. Global FX Regulations

---

9. Strategies for Managing International Financial Risks

Businesses use these strategies to mitigate FX and financial risks:

Case Study: Nabil Bank’s FX Hedging

• Problem: Nabil Bank lends $10M USD to a Nepali exporter but receives NPR payments.
• Risk: If NPR weakens, the NPR value of the loan drops.
• Solution:
  1. Forward contract: Locks USD/NPR rate at 110 for 1 year.
  2. FX options: Buys an option to sell USD at 110 if NPR strengthens beyond 100.
• Result: Nabil Bank protects its NPR revenue.

---

In the Real World

1. eSewa’s FX Risk Management

   • Idea: Natural hedging (matching USD inflows from international users with USD expenses).
   • How: eSewa partners with Visa/Mastercard to process USD payments for Nepali users abroad (e.g., NRs working in Gulf). The USD inflows offset eSewa’s USD payments for global payment processors.
   • Real impact: Reduces eSewa’s need for costly FX hedging.

2. Daraz’s Pricing Strategy (PPP)

   • Idea: Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) to set local prices.
   • How: Daraz adjusts product prices in NPR based on local income levels (e.g., a $50 product costs 5,500 NPR in Nepal but 500 NPR in a low-income district via subsidies).
   • Real impact: Prevents price discrimination while maintaining profitability.

3. NEPSE’s Stock Market Volatility (Capital Flows)

   • Idea: Hot money flows affecting NPR and stock prices.
   • How: In 2021, Indian investors poured money into NEPSE (e.g., Ncell, Siddhartha Bank), driving up stock prices. When they withdrew in 2022 due to India’s economic slowdown, NPR depreciated by 5% and NEPSE index fell by 10%.
   • Worked example:
     • Before: 1 NPR = 0.0085 USD (2021).
     • After: 1 NPR = 0.0080 USD (2022).
     • Impact: A Nepali investor holding 1 million NPR in NEPSE saw their portfolio worth $8,500 → $8,000 (10% loss).

---

Exam Tip

This unit is highly numerical and case-study focused. Expect:

1. Calculations:

   • Exchange rate adjustments (e.g., "If NPR depreciates by 10%, how much more will NTC pay for USD equipment?").
   • Interest rate parity (e.g., "Given USD interest = 3%, NPR interest = 5%, what should the forward rate be?").
   • PPP comparisons (e.g., "Using PPP, what should the exchange rate be if a Big Mac costs $5 in the US and 550 NPR in Nepal?").
   • Hedging costs (e.g., "If Nabil Bank hedges $1M USD at 110 NPR, what is the cost if NPR moves to 120?").

2. Case Analysis:

   • Scenario-based questions (e.g., "How would Daraz manage FX risk if NPR weakens by 20%?").
   • Compare Nepal’s FX system with a floating system (e.g., "Why does NRB use a managed float instead of a pure float?").
   • Impact of IMF loans (e.g., "How did the 2020 IMF loan affect Nepal’s balance of payments?").

3. Strategic Recommendations:

   • Suggest a hedging strategy for a Nepali exporter (e.g., "How would Himalayan Java protect its USD revenue?").
   • Evaluate capital flow risks (e.g., "Why did hot money outflow cause the 2015 NPR crash?").

How to score full marks:

• Show calculations (even if approximate) for exchange rate adjustments.
• Use real Nepali examples (NEPSE, Daraz, NTC) to explain concepts.
• Compare Nepal’s policies with global standards (e.g., Basel III, IMF conditions).
• Draw flowcharts for hedging strategies or capital flow diagrams (use Mermaid).
• For case studies, follow the PESTEL framework (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) to analyze risks.

Common Pitfalls:

• Assuming Nepal uses a fixed exchange rate (it’s a managed float).
• Ignoring NRB’s regulations (e.g., capital repatriation rules for FDI).
• Mixing up transaction, translation, and economic exposure (define each clearly).
• Not linking theory to Nepal (always tie concepts to NEPSE, Daraz, or NRB).