Strategic Management for Travel and TourismUnit 512 min read
Business-Level Strategies: Competitive Tactics for Travel & Tourism
Unit 5 of Strategic Management for Travel and Tourism explores Porter’s generic strategies, focus strategies, and innovation-based tactics—how travel firms like Nabil Bank’s travel desk or Daraz’s logistics compete in niche markets, balance cost vs. differentiation, and adapt to dynamic demand (e.g., post-COVID recover
Core Concepts: What Are Business-Level Strategies?
Business-level strategies are actionable plans a single business unit (e.g., a hotel chain’s luxury segment, a tour operator’s adventure package) uses to gain a competitive edge in its chosen market. Unlike corporate-level strategies (e.g., diversification), these focus on how to compete—not where.
Key Questions Answered:
- Should we compete on price (like Pathao’s ride-hailing) or unique features (like Himalayan Java’s organic coffee tours)?
- Who is our target customer (budget backpackers vs. luxury travelers)?
- How do we outperform rivals in our chosen segment?
1. Porter’s Generic Strategies: The 3 Ways to Compete
Michael Porter identified three primary ways to achieve competitive advantage. Each requires trade-offs (you can’t be all at once).
A. Cost Leadership (Low-Cost Provider)
Definition: Become the lowest-cost producer in the industry while maintaining acceptable quality. How? Economies of scale, efficient operations, supplier negotiations, and lean processes.
Worked Example: NTC’s Budget Travel Packages
- Scenario: Nepal Telecom (NTC) offers "Nepal Travel Pass"—unlimited SIM data + discounted hotel vouchers for tourists.
- Strategy: Bundling services reduces per-unit cost for customers and locks in loyalty.
- Trade-off: Lower profit margins per transaction but higher volume (e.g., 50% more bookings than competitors).
Advantages/Disadvantages:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| High market share | Price wars can erode profits |
| Deters competitors | Low customer loyalty (switchers) |
| Works in price-sensitive markets | Requires constant cost-cutting |
Real-World Tie-In:
- Pathao’s "Happy Hour" Discounts: Uses dynamic pricing to fill idle driver slots during off-peak hours (cost leadership via demand smoothing).
- Nabil Bank’s Travel Desk: Offers zero-commission foreign exchange for bulk corporate clients (cost leadership in B2B travel services).
B. Differentiation
Definition: Offer unique features that customers perceive as superior, justifying premium prices. How? Branding, customization, superior service, or innovation.
Worked Example: Chaudhary Group’s "Everest Base Camp Luxury Trek"
- Unique Selling Points (USPs):
- Private Sherpa guides (vs. group treks).
- Gourmet meals (vs. standard dal-bhat).
- Helicopter transfers for emergencies.
- Pricing: 30% higher than standard treks but 90% repeat bookings.
- Trade-off: Higher operational costs but strong brand loyalty.
Advantages/Disadvantages:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Premium pricing | High marketing costs |
| Customer loyalty | Easier for competitors to copy |
| Less sensitive to price wars | Requires strong R&D/service |
Real-World Tie-In:
- Google Flights’ "Price Guarantee": Differentiates by offering refunds if prices drop after booking (unlike Ncell Travel’s static fares).
- Khalti’s "Instant Travel Insurance": Partners with insurers to offer same-day coverage for digital payments (differentiation in fintech-travel integration).
C. Focus (Cost or Differentiation in a Niche)
Definition: Target a specific segment (geographic, demographic, or product-line) and dominate it via cost leadership or differentiation. Subtypes:
- Cost Focus: Lowest cost in a niche (e.g., budget hostels in Kathmandu).
- Differentiation Focus: Unique features for a niche (e.g., LGBTQ+ travel packages).
mindmap
root((Porter’s Generic Strategies))
Cost Leadership
Lowest cost
Economies of scale
Lean operations
Differentiation
Unique features
Branding
Customization
Focus
Niche market
Cost Focus
Differentiation Focus**Worked Example: Kathmandu’s "Heritage Walk Tours" (Focus Differentiation)
- Niche: History buffs aged 40+.
- USPs:
- Guides with PhDs in Nepali history.
- Themed walks (e.g., "Newari Architecture Tour").
- Exclusive access to closed temples.
- Pricing: $50 vs. $20 for standard walks.
- Result: 80% repeat customers; no direct competitors.
Advantages/Disadvantages:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Less competition | Limited market size |
| Higher margins | Hard to expand beyond niche |
| Strong customer relationships | Vulnerable to niche shifts |
Real-World Tie-In:
- Toyota’s "Prius" in Nepal: Focus differentiation in the hybrid car niche (targets eco-conscious urban professionals).
- Daraz’s "Local Delivery": Focus cost leadership for same-day deliveries in Kathmandu (vs. nationwide standard shipping).
2. Innovation-Based Strategies
In travel/tourism, innovation can create entirely new markets or disrupt existing ones.
A. First-Mover Advantage
Definition: Being the first to enter a market and establish brand dominance. Examples:
- Airbnb in Nepal: First to offer homestays (vs. traditional hotels).
- Pathao in ride-hailing: Entered before Uber/Karpool.
**Worked Example: Nepal’s "Digital Nomad Visa" (2023)
- Innovation: Government partnered with eSewa to offer 3-month work visas for remote workers.
- Strategy: Attract high-spending digital nomads (avg. spend: $3,000/month).
- Risk: Requires infrastructure (co-working spaces, fast internet).
Pros/Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Brand leadership | High R&D costs |
| Customer loyalty | Imitators can copy |
| Premium pricing | Market may not exist yet |
B. Blue Ocean Strategy (Creating New Markets)
Definition: Instead of competing in red oceans (crowded markets), create blue oceans (untapped demand). How? Combine existing industries or redefine customer needs.
flowchart TD
A["Red Ocean: Compete"] --> B["Existing Market\nHigh Competition"]
A --> C["Example: Standard Treks\n(Compete with Himalayan Java, Seven Summit Treks)"]
D["Blue Ocean: Create"] --> E["New Market\nLow Competition"]
D --> F["Example: 'Slow Travel'\n(Combine trekking + yoga retreats + local homestays)"]**Worked Example: Nepal’s "Yoga and Trekking Retreats"
- Blue Ocean: Merged yoga tourism (growing globally) with trekking.
- Innovators: The Yoga House (Pokhara) and Om Yoga Retreat (Kathmandu).
- Result: 40% higher revenue per guest vs. standard treks.
Real-World Tie-In:
- WhatsApp Payments in Nepal: Created a blue ocean by combining messaging + payments (no direct competitor before Khalti).
- Daraz’s "Cash on Delivery + Installments": Combined e-commerce + micro-loans for rural customers.
3. Strategic Groups and Competitive Dynamics
Definition: Firms in the same strategic group (e.g., luxury hotels vs. budget hostels) compete more intensely than those in different groups.
mindmap
root((Nepal’s Tourism Strategic Groups))
Luxury Hotels
Example: Dwarika’s Hotel
Strategy: Differentiation
Budget Hostels
Example: Thamel’s hostels
Strategy: Cost Focus
Adventure Tour Operators
Example: Seven Summit Treks
Strategy: Differentiation
Religious Pilgrimage
Example: Lumbini tours
Strategy: Focus**Worked Example: Kathmandu’s Hotel Wars
- Group 1 (Luxury): Dwarika’s Hotel, Yak & Yeti (differentiation).
- Group 2 (Mid-Range): Hotel Himalaya, Soaltee (cost leadership).
- Group 3 (Budget): Thamel hostels (cost focus).
- Mobility Barriers: Luxury hotels have high switching costs (loyalty programs), while budget hostels compete on price transparency (e.g., Agoda reviews).
In the Real World
Daraz’s Logistics Strategy
- Idea Used: Cost Focus + Innovation
- How? Daraz’s "Daraz Mart" (physical stores) acts as last-mile hubs, reducing delivery costs by 30% vs. home delivery. This is a focus cost strategy for urban Nepal.
Nabil Bank’s Travel Desk
- Idea Used: Differentiation + Focus
- How? Offers exclusive travel insurance for corporate clients (e.g., Nepal Investment Bank employees) at a 20% discount. This is a focus differentiation strategy targeting B2B travel.
Pathao’s Dynamic Pricing
- Idea Used: Cost Leadership via Demand Smoothing
- How? Uses surge pricing during peak hours (e.g., 7–9 PM in Kathmandu) to balance supply/demand, ensuring drivers earn more while keeping fares competitive for customers.
Case Study: Toyota Kirloskar Motor (Nepal) – Focus Differentiation
Company: Toyota’s hybrid/electric vehicle push in Nepal. Strategy: Focus Differentiation in the eco-conscious urban market. Execution:
- Target Segment: Kathmandu/Lalitpur professionals (avg. income: $1,500/month).
- USPs:
- Prius Hybrid: 30% lower fuel costs vs. petrol cars.
- Free EV charging at select Toyota service centers.
- Financing schemes (3-year loans at 8% interest).
- Results:
- 60% market share in hybrid cars (2023).
- Brand perception: "Premium but practical."
SWOT Analysis:
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Strong brand trust | High upfront cost |
| Government incentives | Limited charging infrastructure |
| Opportunities | Threats |
| Growth in EV subsidies | Petrol cars still dominant |
| Urbanization trend | Competitors (e.g., Tata) entering |
Exam Tip
How This Unit Is Tested
- Definitions: Expect 2–3 marks for precise definitions (e.g., "Explain cost leadership with an example from Nepal’s tourism sector").
- Applications: 5–7 marks for real-world examples (e.g., "How does Daraz use a focus strategy?").
- Comparisons: 4–5 marks for Porter’s strategies table (pros/cons) or strategic groups mindmap.
- Cases: 8–10 marks for short cases (e.g., "Analyze Nabil Bank’s travel desk using Porter’s model").
- Diagrams: 3–5 marks for drawing/labeling (e.g., Porter’s generic strategies tree).
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Mixing corporate-level and business-level strategies: E.g., saying "diversification is a business-level strategy" (it’s corporate-level).
- Ignoring trade-offs: Always mention what is sacrificed (e.g., "Differentiation requires higher costs").
- Vague examples: Use specific Nepali companies (e.g., "Himalayan Java’s coffee tours" vs. "a coffee shop").
High-Score Formula
- Start with a definition (1 mark).
- Use a real Nepali example (2 marks).
- Add a diagram (3 marks).
- Compare pros/cons or link to another strategy (3 marks).
- End with a conclusion (1 mark).
Example Exam Answer (8 Marks): Question: "Discuss how Pathao applies Porter’s cost leadership strategy. Use a SWOT analysis to support your answer."
Answer: Pathao uses cost leadership by optimizing driver supply and dynamic pricing to minimize operational costs while offering competitive fares.
How?
- Surge Pricing: Adjusts fares based on demand (e.g., 2x price during peak hours), ensuring driver availability without overpaying.
- Pooling: Matches multiple passengers to one driver (reduces empty trips by 40%).
- Partnerships: Works with NTC for data bundles (discounted for Pathao users), reducing customer acquisition costs.
SWOT Analysis:
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Low-cost operations | Driver dependency |
| High market penetration | Regulatory risks (e.g., traffic laws) |
| Opportunities | Threats |
| Expansion to rural areas | Competitors (e.g., Uber) |
| Government transport subsidies | Fuel price volatility |
Conclusion: Pathao’s cost leadership is sustainable due to its tech-driven efficiency, but driver management remains a critical challenge. (8 marks)
Based on the TU BTTM syllabus for Strategic Management for Travel and Tourism, unit 5.
Discussion
Loading…