3. Write long answers to the following questions in about 150 words each. a) As the chief of a local government unit of your country, what would you do to address the feelings of the women like…

a) Addressing the Feelings of Women Like Julia de Burgos as a Local Government Chief

Julia de Burgos, in her poem "I Was My Own Route," expresses her frustration with societal expectations that restrict women’s freedom, creativity, and self-expression. As the chief of a local government unit, I would prioritize policies and initiatives that empower women like Julia by breaking gender barriers and fostering an inclusive society.

First, I would promote education and skill development for women. Many women, especially in rural areas, lack access to quality education due to cultural biases. Establishing girls’ scholarship programs, vocational training centers, and adult literacy classes would help them gain confidence and economic independence. For example, workshops on digital literacy, entrepreneurship, and leadership would enable women to challenge traditional roles.

Second, I would challenge discriminatory social norms through awareness campaigns. Many women face restrictions on their mobility, career choices, and decision-making power. Organizing community dialogues, women’s rights seminars, and media campaigns would encourage men and women to question harmful practices like child marriage, gender-based violence, and workplace discrimination. Partnering with NGOs and local influencers would amplify these messages.

Third, I would ensure women’s political and economic participation. Quotas for women in local governance, reserved seats in cooperatives, and incentives for women-led businesses would give them a voice in decision-making. For instance, supporting women in agriculture through cooperative farming would improve their economic status.

Finally, I would create safe spaces where women can express themselves freely—through art, poetry, and public speaking. Establishing women’s literary clubs, theater groups, and open mic sessions would encourage creativity and solidarity. By addressing systemic barriers, I would help women like Julia de Burgos reclaim their autonomy and contribute meaningfully to society.

---

b) Was Monsieur Durand’s Final Step in Facing Death the Right Decision?

In Facing Death, Monsieur Durand, a wealthy landowner, faces a moral crisis when he realizes his greed and exploitation have ruined the lives of the poor. His final decision—to sell his land to the poor at a fair price and distribute his wealth—was a noble but flawed step.

Why It Was the Right Step:

1. Redemption for His Sins – Durand’s life of selfishness had caused suffering. His decision to repent and help the poor shows moral courage and a desire for justice.
2. Symbol of Social Justice – By giving land to the poor, he acknowledges their right to dignity and resources, aligning with ethical principles.
3. Inspiration for Change – His act could encourage others to challenge exploitation and prioritize collective welfare over personal gain.

Why It Was Not Enough:

1. Too Late for Many – His wealth redistribution comes after years of suffering. Many victims (like the starving family) may have already perished or been permanently harmed.
2. No Systemic Change – His act is individualistic; it does not address the root causes of poverty, such as corrupt systems, lack of education, or economic inequality.
3. Risk of Exploitation Again – Without strong institutions, future landowners might repeat his mistakes. Policies, not just charity, are needed for lasting change.

Conclusion:

Durand’s decision was morally commendable but insufficient as a standalone solution. A combination of personal repentance and systemic reforms—such as land reforms, fair wages, and education—would have been more effective in preventing future injustices.

---

OR

Runtu’s Case in Chinese Society and Nepali Living Conditions Today

Runtu’s Struggle in My Old Home

In My Old Home, Runtu, a poor Chinese boy, faces extreme poverty, hunger, and social neglect. His family’s struggle highlights systemic issues in traditional Chinese society:

• Class Disparities – The wealthy elite (like the landlord) exploit the poor, denying them basic rights.
• Lack of Education – Runtu’s family cannot afford schooling, trapping them in poverty.
• No Social Safety Net – Unlike modern welfare systems, China at that time had no government aid, leaving families to fend for themselves.

Nepali Living Conditions Today: Better or Worsening?

Nepal has made progress in some areas but still faces major challenges.

My Position: Mixed but Worsening for Many

While urban Nepalis enjoy better healthcare, education, and connectivity, rural and marginalized groups (Dalits, indigenous communities, women) are worse off than before.

• Example 1 (Improvement): Kathmandu now has 24/7 electricity and better hospitals, but rural areas still face power cuts and lack of doctors.
• Example 2 (Worsening): Farmers struggle due to climate change (droughts, landslides), wages remain low, and youth migration has emptied villages.
• Example 3 (Inequality): The rich-poor gap is widening; a few elites control businesses, while most workers earn minimum wage (₹300-500/day).

Conclusion:

Nepal has some progress, but systemic issues—corruption, weak governance, and economic inequality—prevent real development. Without strong policies, fair wages, and rural investment, living conditions for the average Nepali will continue to worsen, especially for the poorest.

---

Body

[object Object]

[object Object]

[object Object]