ACC201 Financial Accounting

Financial AccountingUnit 916 min read

Financial Statement Analysis: Ratios, Trends & Decision-Making

Unit 9 of Financial Accounting teaches how to analyze financial statements using tools like ratio analysis, trend analysis, and comparative statements to assess a company’s profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency—with real-world Nepali business examples.

TAKEAWAYS:

  • Ratios reveal hidden truths: Liquidity ratios (e.g., current ratio) show if a business like Ncell can pay bills; profitability ratios (e.g., ROE) explain why Daraz’s margins differ from Khalti’s.
  • Trends > snapshots: Comparing Nepal Bank’s 2077 vs. 2078 financials spot growth in loans or shrinking deposits—critical for investors.
  • Common-size statements standardize: Convert Everest Bank’s Rs 500M sales to 100% to compare with Global IME’s Rs 2B—scale doesn’t distort.
  • Cash ≠ profit: Pathao’s high revenue but negative cash flow from operations (CFSO) explains why it needs constant funding.
  • Red flags: Rising inventory turnover for BigMart might mean unsold stock; declining debt-to-equity for NTC signals conservative financing.
  • Limitations matter: Ratios ignore inflation, qualitative factors (e.g., Nepalgunj’s brand reputation), and industry differences.

1. Why Analyze Financial Statements?

Financial statements (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement) are like a car’s dashboard: they show speed (profit), fuel (cash), and engine health (assets/liabilities). But raw numbers don’t tell the story—analysis turns data into decisions.

Key Users of Financial Analysis

User What They Need to Know Example in Nepal
Investors Is the company profitable? Can it pay dividends? Shareholders of Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) checking ROE.
Creditors Can the company repay loans? Nabil Bank assessing Daraz’s debt ratios before lending.
Managers Where are inefficiencies? Khalti’s CEO comparing transaction costs vs. revenue.
Government/Regulators Compliance, tax liabilities, economic health. Nepal Rastra Bank monitoring Nepal Investment Bank’s liquidity.

2. Tools of Financial Statement Analysis

A. Ratio Analysis: The "Math Behind the Numbers"

Ratios compare two financial figures to reveal relationships. All ratios use data from the Balance Sheet, Income Statement, or Cash Flow Statement.

1. Liquidity Ratios: Can the Company Pay Its Bills?

Formula: Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities Interpretation:

  • >1.5: Healthy (e.g., Ncell in 2078: Rs 800M current assets / Rs 300M liabilities = 2.67).
  • <1: Risky (e.g., a struggling Kathmandu garment shop with Rs 500K assets vs. Rs 600K creditors).
Current Ratio: 2.67 (60%)Quick Ratio: 1.8 (30%)Cash Ratio: 0.5 (10%)
Liquidity Ratios for Ncell (2078) – Shows strong short-term solvency (Current Ratio >1.5).

Real World:

  • NTC’s liquidity crisis (2077): Current ratio dropped to 0.9 due to unpaid supplier bills, forcing emergency loans from Nepal Bank.
  • Khalti’s advantage: Holds 80% of transactions in cash equivalents, giving it a cash ratio of 0.7—far higher than banks.
2. Profitability Ratios: Is the Business Making Money?
Ratio Formula Example: Daraz Nepal (2078) Interpretation
Gross Profit Margin (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue (Rs 800M - Rs 600M) / Rs 800M = 25% High COGS (shipping costs) drag margins.
Net Profit Margin Net Income / Revenue Rs 20M / Rs 800M = 2.5% Thin margins due to heavy discounts.
ROA (Return on Assets) Net Income / Total Assets Rs 20M / Rs 1.2B = 1.67% Low asset efficiency vs. Nepalgunj’s 8%.
ROE (Return on Equity) Net Income / Shareholders' Equity Rs 20M / Rs 400M = 5% Investors expect higher returns.

Worked Example: Kathmandu Retail Shop (Rs in ‘000)

  • Sales: Rs 5,000
  • COGS: Rs 3,500
  • Operating Expenses: Rs 1,200
  • Net Income: Rs 300
  • Total Assets: Rs 2,000
  • Equity: Rs 1,000
| Ratio               | Calculation                     | Value  | Industry Benchmark | Verdict                     |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------|
| Gross Margin        | (5000 - 3500) / 5000           | 30%    | 40-50%             | **Weak**: High theft/discounts? |
| Net Margin          | 300 / 5000                     | 6%     | 8-12%              | **Poor**: High overheads?    |
| ROA                 | 300 / 2000                     | 15%    | 10-15%             | **Average**                 |
| ROE                 | 300 / 1000                     | 30%    | 15-20%             | **Strong**: Leveraged well? |

Real World:

  • Nepalgunj’s ROE (2078): 18% vs. Daraz’s 5%—explains why investors prefer retail over e-commerce.
  • Banking sector: Nabil Bank’s ROA of 1.2% reflects low-interest margins vs. Standard Chartered’s 1.8%.
3. Solvency Ratios: Can the Company Survive Long-Term?
Ratio Formula Example: Everest Bank (2078) Red Flag Threshold
Debt-to-Equity (D/E) Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity Rs 800M / Rs 400M = 2.0 >3.0: Over-leveraged
Interest Coverage EBIT / Interest Expense Rs 150M / Rs 20M = 7.5 <1.5: Risk of default

Real World:

  • NTC’s D/E ratio: 4.5 (2077) → 3.8 (2078). Still high due to infrastructure loans.
  • Khalti’s D/E: 0.1—no debt, funded by equity/investors.
4. Efficiency Ratios: How Well Does the Company Use Assets?
Ratio Formula Example: Pathao (2078) Improvement Idea
Inventory Turnover COGS / Average Inventory Rs 400M / Rs 50M = 8 times Goal: 12 times (reduce storage).
Receivables Turnover Credit Sales / Average Receivables Rs 600M / Rs 30M = 20 times Goal: 30 times (faster collections).
Asset Turnover Revenue / Total Assets Rs 800M / Rs 1.5B = 0.53 Goal: 0.8 (use assets better).

Real World:

  • BigMart’s inventory turnover: 6 times → 4 times (2077-78). Problem: Overstocking perishables.
  • Nepal Oil’s turnover: 12 times—efficient supply chain.

3. Trend Analysis: Spotting Patterns Over Time

How it works: Compare ratios across 3-5 years to see improvements or declines.

Example: Comparative Financials of Rara Company (2076-2078)

| Year  | Current Ratio | Gross Margin | Debt/Equity | Comment                          |
|-------|---------------|---------------|-------------|----------------------------------|
| 2076  | 1.2           | 35%           | 1.8         | **Weak liquidity**, high debt.   |
| 2077  | 1.5           | 38%           | 1.5         | **Improving**, but still risky.  |
| 2078  | 2.1           | 42%           | 1.2         | **Strong**: Better management.   |

Mermaid Trend Diagram:

graph LR
    A["2076: Current Ratio = 1.2"] -->|"↑"| B["2077: 1.5"]
    B -->|"↑"| C["2078: 2.1"]
    A["2076: Debt/Equity = 1.8"] -->|"↓"| D["2077: 1.5"]
    D -->|"↓"| E["2078: 1.2"]

Key Insight: Rara Company’s liquidity and solvency improved, but profitability stagnated (gross margin only rose by 7% over 3 years).

Real World:

  • Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA): Current ratio fell from 1.3 (2076) to 0.9 (2078) due to delayed payments from Nepal Government.
  • Nepal Bank’s ROA: Rose from 0.8% (2076) to 1.2% (2078)—better loan portfolio management.

4. Comparative Financial Statements: "Apples-to-Apples" Analysis

Why? Companies grow/shrink over time. Common-size statements adjust for scale.

Example: Common-Size Income Statement for Two Nepali Retailers

| Particular          | Kathmandu Retail (Rs 5M Sales) | Nepalgunj (Rs 50M Sales) | Difference                     |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Revenue             | 100%                           | 100%                     | Same base.                     |
| COGS                | 70%                            | 65%                      | Nepalgunj **more efficient**.   |
| Gross Profit        | 30%                            | 35%                      | **5% better margin**.           |
| Operating Expenses  | 25%                            | 20%                      | Nepalgunj **lower costs**.      |
| Net Income          | 5%                             | 10%                      | **Double profitability**.       |
00.250.50.751Retailer A (2078)0Retailer B (2078)0Percentage of Revenue
Common-size comparison highlights Retailer A’s efficiency advantage.

Real World:

  • Daraz vs. BigMart: Both have ~30% gross margins, but Daraz’s operating expenses are 40% vs. BigMart’s 25% (high tech costs).
  • NTC vs. Ncell: NTC’s revenue is 80% from tariffs, while Ncell’s is 60% from data—different business models.

5. Cash Flow Statement Analysis: Profit ≠ Cash

Key Question: Can the company generate cash from operations? Formula: Cash Flow from Operations (CFO) = Net Income + Non-Cash Expenses (e.g., Depreciation) - ΔWorking Capital

Example: Pathao’s Cash Flow (2078)

| Particular               | Amount (Rs ‘000) |
|--------------------------|------------------|
| Net Income               | 20,000           |
| + Depreciation           | 5,000            |
| - Increase in Receivables| (10,000)         |
| - Increase in Inventory  | (2,000)          |
| **CFO**                  | **13,000**       |
| **CFI (Investing)**      | (15,000)         | *Bought new vehicles* |
| **CFF (Financing)**      | 5,000            | *Issued shares*       |
| **Net Change in Cash**   | **3,000**        |

Red Flags:

  • Negative CFO: Company relies on loans/investments (e.g., a startup with Rs 50M revenue but -Rs 10M CFO).
  • High CFI: Heavy capital expenditure (e.g., NTC’s Rs 20B spent on fiber optics).

Real World:

  • Khalti’s CFO: Rs 800M (2078)—strong cash generation from transaction fees.
  • Nepalgunj’s CFO: Rs 150M but CFI of -Rs 200M (expanding stores).

6. Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis

Limitation Example How to Mitigate
Historical Data Ratios show past performance, not future potential. Combine with management forecasts.
Inflation Distortion Rs 1M in 2075 ≠ Rs 1M in 2078. Use real (inflation-adjusted) numbers.
Industry Differences A current ratio of 1.2 is good for retail but bad for utilities. Compare within the same industry.
Window Dressing Companies manipulate numbers (e.g., delaying payments to boost ratios). Check footnotes and audit reports.
Qualitative Factors Ratios ignore brand reputation (e.g., Nepalgunj’s trust) or management quality. Conduct interviews/analyst reports.

In the Real World

  1. eSewa’s Profitability Puzzle

    • Ratio Used: Net Profit Margin
    • How? eSewa’s revenue is Rs 12B (2078), but net income is only Rs 100M (0.83% margin).
    • Why? High transaction fees to banks (3-5%) and fraud losses (Rs 200M/year).
    • Decision: Investors push for AI fraud detection to improve margins.
  2. NTC’s Solvency Crisis

    • Ratio Used: Debt-to-Equity (D/E) and Interest Coverage
    • Numbers:
      • D/E = 4.5 (2077) → 3.8 (2078).
      • Interest Coverage = 1.2 (barely covers interest).
    • Real Impact: NTC had to negotiate with creditors to avoid default.
  3. Daraz’s Cash Flow Struggle

    • Ratio Used: Cash Flow from Operations (CFO)
    • Problem: Daraz’s CFO is negative despite Rs 800M revenue because:
      • High inventory costs (unsold goods).
      • Aggressive discounts (low gross margins).
    • Solution: Layoffs (2078) to cut operating expenses.

Exam Tip: How to Score Full Marks

  1. Structure Your Answer
    • Step 1: Define the ratio/tool (e.g., "Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities").
    • Step 2: Interpret the formula (e.g., "Measures short-term liquidity").
    • Step 3: Apply to given data (show calculations).
    • Step 4: Compare with benchmarks/industry standards.
    • Step 5: State limitations (e.g., "Ignores qualitative factors").
Current Assets vs. Current Liabilities (Ncell 2078)Dr.Cr.To Inventory300To Cash500By Accounts Payable300By Balance c/d500800800
T-account breakdown of Current Ratio components (simplified).
  1. Common Exam Traps

    • ❌ Ignoring units: Always label ratios (e.g., "Current Ratio = 2.5:1").
    • ❌ Using wrong data: Ensure you’re using Balance Sheet (for assets/liabilities) or Income Statement (for revenue/expenses).
    • ❌ Overlooking trends: If given 3 years of data, always compare them.
  2. Numerical Questions: Show All Work

    • Example Question: "Calculate the gross profit margin for a company with Rs 10M revenue and Rs 6M COGS."
    • Full-Mark Answer:
      Gross Profit Margin = (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue
                         = (10M - 6M) / 10M
                         = 4M / 10M
                         = 0.4 or 40%.
      Interpretation: The company retains **40% of revenue after COGS**, which is **above the retail industry average of 30-35%**.
      
  3. Descriptive Questions: Use Real Examples

    • Example Question: "Explain the importance of trend analysis."
    • Full-Mark Answer:

      Trend analysis helps identify patterns over time, such as NTC’s declining current ratio from 1.3 (2076) to 0.9 (2078), signaling liquidity risks. For Nepal Bank, rising ROA from 0.8% to 1.2% indicates better asset utilization. Without trends, a single-year snapshot (e.g., 2078’s ratios) could mislead investors into thinking a struggling company (like a garment exporter with a one-time high sales year) is healthy.

  4. Cash Flow Statement Questions

    • Key Focus Areas:
      • Operating Activities: Is the company self-sustaining?
      • Investing Activities: Is it growing (e.g., NTC buying fiber optics) or shrinking?
      • Financing Activities: Is it borrowing too much (e.g., a startup with high CFF)?

Practice Questions (With Solutions)

Q1: Ratio Calculation

Given: Everest Company’s Balance Sheet (2078)

  • Current Assets: Rs 500M
  • Current Liabilities: Rs 300M
  • Total Assets: Rs 1.2B
  • Total Equity: Rs 600M
  • Net Income: Rs 50M

Calculate and interpret:

  1. Current Ratio
  2. Debt-to-Equity Ratio
  3. ROE

Solution:

| Ratio               | Calculation                     | Value  | Interpretation                          |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Current Ratio       | 500M / 300M                     | 1.67   | **Strong liquidity** (can pay short-term debts). |
| Debt-to-Equity      | (1.2B - 600M) / 600M            | 1.0    | **Moderate leverage** (equal debt/equity). |
| ROE                 | 50M / 600M                      | 8.33%  | **Good return for shareholders** (vs. bank ROE of ~1.2%). |

Q2: Trend Analysis

Given: Rara Company’s Net Profit Margin (2076-2078)

  • 2076: 5%
  • 2077: 6%
  • 2078: 4%

Answer:

The net profit margin declined from 6% (2077) to 4% (2078), reversing a previous 1% improvement (2076-77). This suggests:

  • Rising costs (e.g., higher raw material prices for a Kathmandu textile shop).
  • Pricing pressure (e.g., Daraz undercutting competitors).
  • One-time expenses (e.g., a lawsuit or asset write-down). Investors should investigate whether this is a temporary dip or a structural issue.

Final Checklist for Exam Day

✅ Memorize key ratios (liquidity, profitability, solvency, efficiency). ✅ Practice calculations—don’t rely on calculators in exams. ✅ Relate to Nepali businesses (NTC, Khalti, Daraz, banks). ✅ State limitations in every analysis (e.g., "Ignores inflation"). ✅ Use real examples in descriptive answers (e.g., "Like NTC’s declining current ratio").


Based on the TU BBM syllabus for Financial Accounting (ACC201), unit 9.

Discussion

Loading…