Business Research MethodsUnit 515 min read
Sampling Design: Types, Methods & Applications in Business Research
Unit 5 of Business Research Methods explores how to select representative samples for business research, covering probability vs. non-probability sampling, sampling techniques, sample size determination, and ethical considerations—with real-world applications in Nepali and global companies.
What is Sampling Design?
Sampling design refers to the methodology used to select a subset (sample) of a population to represent the entire group for research. It ensures accuracy, reliability, and generalizability of research findings while balancing cost, time, and feasibility.
Why is Sampling Important?
- Population vs. Sample: A population is the entire group being studied (e.g., all customers of Nabil Bank). A sample is a subset of that population (e.g., 500 Nabil Bank customers surveyed).
- Purpose: Sampling allows researchers to make inferences about the population without studying everyone (e.g., predicting voter behavior in Nepal’s elections by surveying 1,000 people instead of 30 million).
- Key Challenge: Ensuring the sample is representative (mirrors the population’s characteristics).
1. Probability vs. Non-Probability Sampling
The two broad categories of sampling differ in how participants are selected and whether every member has a known chance of being chosen.
Comparison Table: Probability vs. Non-Probability Sampling
| Feature | Probability Sampling | Non-Probability Sampling |
|---|---|---|
| Selection Basis | Random selection (everyone has a chance) | Non-random (researcher’s judgment or convenience) |
| Representativeness | High (generalizable to population) | Low (may introduce bias) |
| Sampling Error | Can be measured and minimized | Cannot be quantified |
| Cost & Time | More expensive and time-consuming | Cheaper and faster |
| Example in Nepal | Randomly selecting 1,000 Daraz customers for a satisfaction survey | Asking first 50 people who walk into a Kathmandu mall about their shopping habits |
1.1 Probability Sampling Methods
These methods ensure every member has a known probability of selection, reducing bias.
A. Simple Random Sampling
- Definition: Every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected.
- How it works:
- Assign a number to each population member (e.g., all NEPSE-listed companies).
- Use a random number generator to pick samples.
- Example:
- To study investor behavior in NEPSE, randomly select 200 shareholders from a list of 10,000.
- Advantages:
- Unbiased, easy to implement.
- Disadvantages:
- Expensive, may miss subgroups (e.g., small investors).
- Visual: Simple Random Sampling Process
flowchart LR A["Population: All NEPSE Shareholders\n(10,000)"] --> B["Assign Unique IDs\n(1-10,000)"] B --> C["Random Number Generator\n(Picks 200 IDs)"] C --> D["Sample:\n200 Shareholders"]
B. Systematic Sampling
- Definition: Select every k-th member from a list after a random start.
- Formula:
- Example:
- If studying Pathao drivers, list all 50,000 drivers, pick a random start (e.g., 15th driver), then select every 250th driver thereafter ().
- Advantages:
- Simple, evenly spaced.
- Disadvantages:
- Risk of periodic bias (e.g., if driver IDs follow a pattern like shifts).
C. Stratified Sampling
- Definition: Divide the population into homogeneous subgroups (strata) and randomly sample from each.
- Example:
- Studying bank loan defaults in Nepal:
- Strata: Rural (Nabil Bank branches), Urban (Global IME), Microfinance (Siddhartha).
- Sample 200 customers from each stratum.
- Studying bank loan defaults in Nepal:
- Advantages:
- Ensures proportional representation of subgroups.
- Disadvantages:
- More complex, requires prior knowledge of strata.
- Visual: Stratified Sampling for Loan Default Study
D. Cluster Sampling
- Definition: Divide population into heterogeneous clusters, randomly select entire clusters, then sample all members.
- Example:
- Studying eSewa users in Nepal:
- Clusters: Provinces (Province 1, 2, 3, etc.).
- Randomly pick 3 provinces, survey all eSewa users in those provinces.
- Studying eSewa users in Nepal:
- Advantages:
- Cost-effective for large/geographically spread populations.
- Disadvantages:
- Less precise than stratified sampling.
1.2 Non-Probability Sampling Methods
Used when random sampling is impractical (e.g., rare populations, high cost).
A. Convenience Sampling
- Definition: Select easily accessible members.
- Example:
- Surveying WhatsApp users by posting a poll in a university group.
- Advantages:
- Fast, cheap.
- Disadvantages:
- High bias (e.g., only tech-savvy students respond).
B. Purposive (Judgmental) Sampling
- Definition: Researcher intentionally selects members based on expertise or relevance.
- Example:
- Studying Nepal’s startup ecosystem: Interviewing founders of Himalayan Java, Khalti, and Daraz.
- Advantages:
- Useful for exploratory research.
- Disadvantages:
- Not generalizable.
C. Snowball Sampling
- Definition: Initial samples refer others with similar traits.
- Example:
- Studying undocumented migrant workers in Nepal:
- Start with 5 workers, ask them to refer 5 more, and so on.
- Studying undocumented migrant workers in Nepal:
- Advantages:
- Useful for hard-to-reach populations.
- Disadvantages:
- Risk of homogeneity bias.
D. Quota Sampling
- Definition: Set quotas for subgroups (like stratified but non-random).
- Example:
- Surveying Khalti users:
- Quota: 30% Kathmandu, 20% Pokhara, 15% Biratnagar, etc.
- Stop sampling once quotas are met.
- Surveying Khalti users:
- Advantages:
- Ensures representation of key groups.
- Disadvantages:
- Introduces selection bias.
2. Sample Size Determination
Choosing the right sample size affects accuracy and cost.
Key Factors Affecting Sample Size
| Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Population Size | Larger populations need larger samples for precision. |
| Confidence Level | Higher confidence (e.g., 95%) requires larger samples. |
| Margin of Error | Smaller error (e.g., ±3%) needs bigger samples. |
| Variability | More diverse populations need larger samples. |
| Resource Constraints | Budget/time limits may reduce sample size. |
Formula for Sample Size (Simple Random Sampling)
- = Sample size
- = Population size
- = Confidence level (e.g., 1.96 for 95% confidence)
- = Margin of error (e.g., 0.05 for 5%)
Worked Example: Sample Size for Daraz Customer Survey
- Population (N): 5 million Daraz customers in Nepal.
- Confidence Level: 95% ()
- Margin of Error (e): 3% (0.03)
- Calculation:
- Conclusion: Survey 1,067 Daraz customers to estimate satisfaction with ±3% error at 95% confidence.
3. Sampling Errors and Biases
Even with careful design, errors can occur.
A. Sampling Errors
- Random Error: Natural variation (e.g., survey responses differ slightly each time).
- Systematic Error: Flaws in design (e.g., underrepresenting rural areas in an urban survey).
B. Common Biases
| Bias Type | Cause | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Selection Bias | Non-random sampling (e.g., only online shoppers). | Surveying Daraz users via email misses offline buyers. |
| Response Bias | Participants lie or misrepresent (e.g., social desirability). | Employees rating their boss highly to avoid conflict. |
| Non-Response Bias | Low response rates (e.g., only 20% reply). | NEPSE investors ignoring a survey. |
| Survivorship Bias | Studying only "successful" cases (ignoring failures). | Analyzing only profitable startups, ignoring failures like "Nepal’s failed fintech apps." |
4. Ethical Considerations in Sampling
- Informed Consent: Participants must know they’re part of a study.
- Anonymity/Confidentiality: Protect identities (e.g., Khalti transaction data).
- Avoiding Harm: Ensure questions don’t cause distress (e.g., asking about financial struggles).
- Transparency: Disclose sampling methods in reports.
## In the Real World
eSewa & Khalti (Nepal)
- Idea Used: Stratified Sampling
- How: To assess digital payment adoption, eSewa divides users by age groups (18-30, 31-50, 50+) and regions (urban/rural). They then randomly sample 500 users from each stratum to ensure balanced feedback.
Daraz (Nepal/Global)
- Idea Used: Cluster Sampling
- How: Daraz studies customer satisfaction by selecting entire cities (clusters) like Kathmandu, Pokhara, and Dhaka. They survey all customers in these clusters to reduce costs while maintaining representativeness.
Nabil Bank (Nepal)
- Idea Used: Systematic Sampling for Loan Default Studies
- How: To predict loan defaults, Nabil Bank lists all 100,000 loan accounts, picks a random start (e.g., account #456), and then selects every 500th account () for analysis. This ensures even coverage across borrowers.
Google (Global)
- Idea Used: Snowball Sampling for Rare Diseases
- How: Google’s DeepMind Health uses snowball sampling to study rare genetic disorders. Initial patients refer others with similar conditions, helping identify patterns in underserved populations.
NTC (Nepal Telecom)
- Idea Used: Convenience Sampling for Customer Feedback
- How: NTC collects feedback via post-survey SMS to recent callers. While convenient, this risks selection bias (only tech-savvy users respond).
## Case Study: How Daraz Uses Sampling to Improve Logistics
Problem: Daraz wants to reduce delivery delays in Nepal’s varied terrain (mountains, cities, rural areas).
Solution:
Stratified Sampling:
- Divides Nepal into 3 strata: Urban (Kathmandu, Lalitpur), Semi-urban (Pokhara, Bharatpur), Rural (Dhankuta, Achham).
- Samples 500 deliveries per stratum to study time efficiency.
Findings:
- Urban areas: 90% on-time (efficient routes).
- Rural areas: Only 60% on-time (terrain challenges).
Action:
- Invests in rural logistics hubs and partnered last-mile delivery (like Pathao drivers).
- Result: 15% faster rural deliveries within a year.
Visual: Daraz’s Stratified Sampling for Logistics
## Exam Tip
What Examiners Look For
Definitions:
- Clearly distinguish probability vs. non-probability sampling.
- Explain stratified vs. cluster sampling (common confusion point).
Applications:
- Link sampling methods to real businesses (e.g., "Nabil Bank uses stratified sampling to study loan defaults by income groups").
- Calculate sample size (show formula steps).
Diagrams:
- Draw flowcharts for sampling processes (e.g., systematic sampling steps).
- Use tables to compare methods (e.g., advantages/disadvantages).
Ethics & Bias:
- Discuss how biases affect validity (e.g., "Convenience sampling in Kathmandu mall overrepresents urban shoppers").
- Mention ethical concerns (e.g., "Snowball sampling may exclude non-connected individuals").
Worked Examples:
- Always relate to Nepal (e.g., "If studying NEPSE investors, use stratified sampling by investment size").
- Show calculations for sample size (even if approximate).
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Mixing up stratified and cluster sampling (stratified = homogeneous groups; cluster = heterogeneous groups).
- Ignoring non-response bias (e.g., "Only 30% replied—how does this affect results?").
- Assuming larger samples are always better (diminishing returns; focus on margin of error).
Practice Questions for TU/PU Exams
- Short Answer:
- "Differentiate between systematic sampling and stratified sampling with an example from Nepal’s banking sector."
- Calculation:
- "A researcher wants to study WhatsApp usage among 2 million Nepali users with 95% confidence and ±4% error. Calculate the sample size."
- Case Study:
- "How would you design a sample to study customer satisfaction for Khalti’s digital wallet? Choose a sampling method and justify."
- Critical Thinking:
- "A company uses convenience sampling to survey employees. What biases might arise? How could they improve?"
Key Formulas to Memorize
| Concept | Formula |
|---|---|
| Sample Size (Finite Population) | |
| Margin of Error (e) | (where = proportion) |
| Confidence Interval |
Final Summary Table
| Sampling Method | When to Use | Example in Nepal | Risk of Bias |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Random | Small, homogeneous populations | Randomly selecting NEPSE shareholders | Low |
| Systematic | Ordered lists (e.g., customer databases) | Selecting every 100th Khalti user | Periodic bias |
| Stratified | Diverse subgroups (e.g., age, region) | Studying loan defaults by income groups | High if strata misdefined |
| Cluster | Geographically spread populations | Surveying all Daraz users in 5 districts | Cluster-level bias |
| Convenience | Quick, low-cost studies | Asking university students about eSewa | High (non-representative) |
| Snowball | Hard-to-reach groups (e.g., migrants) | Studying undocumented workers via referrals | Homogeneity bias |
| Quota | Ensuring subgroup representation | Surveying equal numbers from 3 provinces | Selection bias |
Based on the TU BIM syllabus for Business Research Methods (RCH201), unit 5.
Discussion
Loading…