Fundamentals of Corporate FinanceUnit 79 min read
Capital Budgeting: NPV, IRR, Payback, PI, and Decision Rules
Unit 7 of Fundamentals of Corporate Finance covers how companies evaluate long-term investment projects using NPV, IRR, payback period, profitability index, and other techniques, with real-world applications in Nepalese businesses like Daraz, Ncell, and banks.
Key Concepts and Techniques
Capital budgeting is the process of evaluating and selecting long-term investment projects that align with a company’s strategic goals. The primary techniques include:
1. Net Present Value (NPV)
- Measures the difference between the present value of cash inflows and outflows.
- If NPV > 0, the project is acceptable; if NPV < 0, it is reject.
- Formula: where = cash flow at time , = discount rate, = initial investment.
2. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
- The discount rate that makes NPV = 0.
- If IRR > required rate of return, accept; otherwise, reject.
- IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR rate (may not be realistic).
3. Payback Period
- The time it takes to recover the initial investment from cash inflows.
- Shorter payback = less risk (but ignores time value of money).
4. Profitability Index (PI)
- Ratio of present value of future cash flows to initial investment.
- PI > 1 = accept; PI < 1 = reject.
5. Comparison of Techniques
| Technique | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| NPV | Considers time value of money | Requires accurate discount rate |
| IRR | Easy to interpret | May have multiple IRRs or conflicts with NPV |
| Payback | Simple, focuses on liquidity | Ignores cash flows after payback |
| PI | Useful for ranking projects | May conflict with NPV in mutually exclusive projects |
How Capital Budgeting Works: The Decision-Making Process
Companies use these techniques to evaluate projects like:
- Expanding a Daraz warehouse (investment in logistics).
- Ncell upgrading its 5G network (capital expenditure).
- A bank issuing a new loan product (long-term commitment).
Worked Example: Kathmandu Retail Shop’s Solar Panel Investment
Scenario: A retail shop in Kathmandu is considering installing solar panels to reduce electricity costs. The initial cost is NPR 500,000, and the expected annual savings are NPR 80,000 for 10 years. The discount rate is 10%.
Step 1: Calculate NPV
| Year | Cash Flow (CF) | PV Factor (10%) | PV of CF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | -500,000 | 1.00 | -500,000 |
| 1 | 80,000 | 0.909 | 72,720 |
| 2 | 80,000 | 0.826 | 66,080 |
| 3 | 80,000 | 0.751 | 60,080 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10 | 80,000 | 0.386 | 30,880 |
Total PV of Cash Flows = NPR 450,000 NPV = 450,000 - 500,000 = -50,000 → Reject (NPV < 0)
But wait! The shop owner realizes the government offers a 20% subsidy on solar panels. The new initial cost is NPR 400,000.
| Year | Cash Flow (CF) | PV Factor (10%) | PV of CF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | -400,000 | 1.00 | -400,000 |
| 1 | 80,000 | 0.909 | 72,720 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10 | 80,000 | 0.386 | 30,880 |
Total PV of Cash Flows = NPR 450,000 NPV = 450,000 - 400,000 = 50,000 → Accept (NPV > 0)
In the Real World
Daraz (Nepal)
- Uses NPV and IRR to decide whether to expand warehouses in new cities (e.g., Biratnagar). A project with a 15% IRR (above Daraz’s cost of capital) gets approved.
Ncell (Nepal)
- Evaluates 5G network upgrades using payback period (e.g., recovering costs in 3–4 years) and NPV to ensure profitability over 10 years.
Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB)
- Assesses loan disbursement to businesses using PI (e.g., a loan with PI > 1.2 is prioritized for approval).
Comparing NPV and IRR: Why They Sometimes Conflict
- NPV is theoretically superior because it uses the company’s cost of capital as the discount rate.
- IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR rate, which may not match the company’s actual reinvestment opportunities.
- Example: A project with NPV = +50,000 but IRR = 8% may be rejected if the company’s cost of capital is 12%, even though NPV suggests acceptance.
Payback Period: Simplicity vs. Limitations
- Advantage: Easy to understand, focuses on liquidity.
- Disadvantage: Ignores the time value of money and cash flows after payback.
- Example: A project with NPR 100,000 initial cost and cash flows of NPR 30,000/year has a payback period of 3.33 years. But if the discount rate is 15%, the NPV might still be negative.
| Year | Cash Flow | Cumulative CF | Payback Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30,000 | 30,000 | - |
| 2 | 30,000 | 60,000 | - |
| 3 | 30,000 | 90,000 | 3.33 |
| 4 | 30,000 | 120,000 | - |
Profitability Index (PI): Ranking Projects
- PI = PV of Future Cash Flows / Initial Investment
- Example: Two projects with the same initial cost (NPR 100,000):
- Project X: PV of cash flows = NPR 120,000 → PI = 1.2
- Project Y: PV of cash flows = NPR 110,000 → PI = 1.1
- Choose X (higher PI).
| Project | Initial Cost | PV of Cash Flows | PI | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | 100,000 | 120,000 | 1.2 | Accept |
| Y | 100,000 | 110,000 | 1.1 | Accept |
| Z | 100,000 | 90,000 | 0.9 | Reject |
Exam Tip
- Always calculate NPV first—it’s the most reliable method.
- IRR conflicts? If NPV and IRR give different signals, trust NPV.
- Payback period is often used in quick screening, but NPV/IRR are preferred for final decisions.
- Memorize formulas:
- Real-world twist: In exams, government subsidies or tax benefits may change NPV—always recalculate if new data is given.
- Mutually exclusive projects? Use NPV to rank (PI may mislead if initial investments differ).
Final Note: Capital budgeting is not just about numbers—it’s about strategic decision-making. Companies like Daraz, Ncell, and banks use these techniques daily to grow sustainably. Master them, and you’ll be ready for both exams and real-world finance roles!
Based on the TU BITM syllabus for Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (FIN229), unit 7.
Discussion
Loading…