Principles of ManagementUnit 57 min read
Decision Making: Models, Techniques & Real-World Applications
Unit 5 of Principles of Management explores the systematic process of decision-making, including rational vs. bounded rationality models, decision-making techniques (SWOT, cost-benefit analysis), and real-world applications in Nepali businesses like Nabil Bank and Daraz.
Key Concepts in Decision Making
1. Definition and Importance
Decision-making is the cognitive process of selecting the best course of action from available alternatives to achieve organizational goals. It is a core managerial function that impacts efficiency, profitability, and competitiveness.
Why is it important?
- Guides resource allocation (e.g., Nabil Bank’s loan approvals).
- Reduces uncertainty (e.g., Daraz’s inventory management).
- Ensures alignment with organizational objectives (e.g., NTC’s network expansion).
2. Types of Decisions
Decisions can be classified based on frequency, structure, and level of management:
mindmap
root((Types of Decisions))
Strategic
Long-term
High risk
Example: NEPSE’s market entry strategy
Tactical
Medium-term
Moderate risk
Example: Daraz’s promotional discounts
Operational
Short-term
Low risk
Example: Pathao’s daily driver routing
Programmed
Routine
Structured
Example: Ncell’s monthly billing
Non-Programmed
Unique
Unstructured
Example: Kathmandu’s traffic congestion solutionsWorked Example: Nabil Bank’s Loan Approval Process
- Strategic Decision: Whether to expand microfinance in rural Nepal.
- Tactical Decision: Setting interest rates for SME loans.
- Operational Decision: Approving a ₹50,000 loan for a small business.
3. Decision-Making Models
Two dominant models explain how decisions are made:
| Model | Assumptions | Limitations | Real-World Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rational Model | Perfect information, logical choices | Rare in reality; ignores human bias | Google’s algorithm-based ad targeting |
| Bounded Rationality | Limited info, satisficing (good enough) | Practical; accounts for cognitive limits | NTC’s network expansion planning |
| Intuitive Model | Experience-based, fast decisions | Risk of bias; hard to justify | Pathao’s last-mile delivery optimizations |
Worked Example: Daraz’s Inventory Decision
- Rational Approach: Maximize profit by ordering based on exact demand forecasts (theoretical).
- Bounded Rationality: Order 80% of forecasted demand to avoid overstock (practical).
4. Decision-Making Techniques
A. SWOT Analysis
A structured method to evaluate Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.
flowchart TD A["SWOT Analysis"] --> B["Strengths"] A --> C["Weaknesses"] A --> D["Opportunities"] A --> E["Threats"] B --> F["Internal: Nabil Bank’s strong CSR"] C --> G["Internal: High employee turnover"] D --> H["External: Rising digital banking trends"] E --> I["External: Competition from NMB Bank"]
Worked Example: NEPSE’s Decision to List New Stocks
- Strengths: Strong investor base in Nepal.
- Weaknesses: Limited liquidity for small caps.
- Opportunities: Government push for privatization.
- Threats: Global market volatility.
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Compares monetary and non-monetary costs vs. benefits of a decision.
Formula: Where:
- = discount rate (e.g., 10% for Nabil Bank).
- = time period.
Worked Example: NTC’s Decision to Upgrade 4G Network
| Year | Cost (₹) | Benefit (₹) | NPV (10%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 50,00,000 | - | -50,00,000 |
| 1 | - | 15,00,000 | 13,63,636 |
| 2 | - | 20,00,000 | 16,54,545 |
| Total NPV | ₹20,18,181 |
Decision: Proceed if NPV > 0 (here, ₹20.18M gain).
C. Decision Trees
Visualizes probabilistic outcomes of decisions.
flowchart TD A["Expand to Pokhara?"] --> B["Yes: 60% chance"] B --> C["Profit: ₹5M"] B --> D["Loss: ₹2M (40%)"] A --> E["No: 100% chance"] E --> F["Profit: ₹1M"]
Worked Example: Khalti’s Decision to Launch UPI
- Option 1: Expand UPI (60% success → ₹10M profit; 40% failure → ₹3M loss).
- Option 2: Stick to existing (₹5M profit).
- Expected Value (EV): Decision: Stick to current (higher EV).
5. Factors Affecting Decision Making
| Factor | Impact | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | Economic, political, social trends | NTC’s decision to adopt 5G (govt. policy) |
| Organizational | Culture, resources, objectives | Nabil Bank’s ethical lending policies |
| Individual | Personality, experience, biases | CEO’s intuition in crisis management |
| Group Dynamics | Team conflict, consensus | Daraz’s cross-departmental product launches |
6. Common Decision-Making Biases
| Bias | Description | Example in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Anchoring | Relying too heavily on first info | NEPSE traders fix prices based on opening rates |
| Confirmation | Seeking info that confirms preconceptions | NTC ignoring 5G alternatives due to past success with 4G |
| Overconfidence | Overestimating one’s judgment | Startups underestimating market risks |
In the Real World
Nabil Bank’s Loan Approval
- Uses cost-benefit analysis to decide loan eligibility.
- SWOT analysis to assess market expansion risks.
- Decision trees for branch location decisions.
Daraz’s Inventory Management
- Applies bounded rationality (orders 80% of forecasted demand).
- Uses NPV calculations for warehouse investments.
Pathao’s Driver Routing
- Intuitive model for real-time traffic adjustments.
- Group decision-making (algorithm + driver feedback).
Exam Tip
- Define clearly: Always start with a precise definition (e.g., "Decision-making is the process of choosing between alternatives...").
- Use real examples: Link theories to Nepali companies (Nabil Bank, NTC, Daraz).
- Show calculations: For CBA/NPV, present tables with clear steps.
- Compare models: Highlight differences between rational vs. bounded rationality.
- SWOT + Decision Trees: These are high-scoring techniques—practice drawing them.
- Biases matter: Mention at least one bias (e.g., anchoring) in your answer.
Visual Summary:
mindmap
root((Decision Making in Nepal))
Models
Rational
Bounded Rationality
Intuitive
Techniques
SWOT
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Trees
Real-World
Nabil Bank: Loan Decisions
Daraz: Inventory
NTC: Network Upgrades
Biases
Anchoring
Confirmation
OverconfidenceBased on the PU BBA (PU) syllabus for Principles of Management, unit 5.
Discussion
Loading…