BHM101 Hotel French

Hotel FrenchUnit 418 min read

Management Principles & Theories: Functions, Theories & Challenges

Unit 4 of Hotel French covers core management theories (classical, scientific, contingency), the 5 functions of management (planning, organizing, leading, controlling), and emerging challenges in hospitality management—with real-world applications in Nepali hotels, eSewa, and global brands like Marriott.

TAKEAWAYS:

  • The 5 functions of management (planning, organizing, leading, controlling, staffing) form the backbone of hospitality operations, from a Kathmandu hotel’s breakfast service to Pathao’s driver dispatch system.
  • Classical theories (Taylor’s scientific management, Fayol’s 14 principles) explain efficiency, while contingency theory shows why no single approach works everywhere—e.g., Daraz’s warehouse vs. a boutique hotel’s front desk.
  • Emerging challenges include digital disruption (AI chatbots in hotels), sustainability (Nepal’s eco-lodges), and cultural diversity (managing international teams at Marriott’s Kathmandu).
  • Worked example: Calculate Nepal Bank’s loan interest using Taylor’s time-motion study principles to optimize teller workflows.
  • Visual tools: Compare theories in a mermaid table, trace a hotel’s daily management cycle as a flowchart, and analyze eSewa’s customer service through Fayol’s 14 principles.
  • Exam focus: Define theories and apply them to Nepali hospitality (e.g., "How does Hotel Yak & Yeti use contingency theory?").

1. The 5 Functions of Management: The "POLCS" Framework

Management is the art of getting things done through people—and in hospitality, it’s about delivering seamless service. The 5 functions of management (POLCS) are the tools every hotel manager uses, from a 5-star resort to a local dhaba. Let’s break them down with real-world examples and visuals.

A. Planning: The Blueprint for Success

Definition: Setting goals, defining strategies, and allocating resources to achieve them. In hotels, this means predicting guest arrivals, menu planning, and budgeting for monsoon season.

How it works:

  1. Strategic planning (long-term): A hotel chain like Marriott in Kathmandu plans to open 10 new properties in Nepal by 2030.
  2. Tactical planning (medium-term): A hotel manager plans a Diwali promotion with discounts and cultural events.
  3. Operational planning (daily): The front desk prepares for a peak season (Dashain/Tihar) by hiring extra staff.

Worked Example: eSewa’s Service Planning eSewa uses planning to:

  • Predict peak transaction times (e.g., after salary days).
  • Allocate customer service agents accordingly.
  • Train agents on common issues (e.g., failed payments).

Visual:

flowchart TD
    A["Strategic Planning\n(Marriott: 10 hotels by 2030)"] --> B["Tactical Planning\n(Hotel Yak: Diwali promo)"] --> C["Operational Planning\n(eSewa: Staffing for salary day)"] --> D["Execution & Monitoring"]

B. Organizing: Structuring the Team

Definition: Arranging resources (people, money, equipment) to achieve goals efficiently. In hotels, this means departmental structure, job roles, and communication flows.

Key Elements:

  • Hierarchy: Who reports to whom? (e.g., Front Desk → Assistant Manager → General Manager)
  • Departmentalization: How are tasks divided? (e.g., Housekeeping, F&B, Sales)
  • Span of Control: How many employees report to one manager? (e.g., 1 F&B manager → 5 chefs → 20 staff)

Real-World Example: Pathao’s Driver Dispatch System Pathao uses organizing to:

  • Assign drivers to zones (e.g., Thapathali, Lakshmi Marg).
  • Use real-time tracking to balance workloads.
  • Train drivers on customer service protocols.

C. Leading (Directing): Motivating the Team

Definition: Guiding, inspiring, and motivating employees to perform at their best. In hospitality, this is critical—happy staff = happy guests.

Leadership Styles:

Style Example in Hospitality When to Use
Autocratic A chef dictating menu changes without input. Crisis (e.g., food poisoning outbreak).
Democratic Team meetings to plan a new breakfast menu. Creative tasks (e.g., event planning).
Laissez-Faire Experienced sommeliers choosing wine pairings. Skilled staff (e.g., bar tenders).

Worked Example: Kathmandu Traffic Management The Kathmandu Metropolitan City (KMC) uses leading to:

  • Motivate traffic police with incentives for reducing congestion.
  • Train drivers on alternative routes during peak hours.
  • Use public awareness campaigns (e.g., "Avoid Thamel at 6 PM").

D. Controlling: Ensuring Quality

Definition: Monitoring performance, comparing it to standards, and taking corrective action. In hotels, this means guest satisfaction scores, food wastage, and service speed.

Steps in Controlling:

  1. Set standards (e.g., room service in 30 mins).
  2. Measure performance (e.g., track response time).
  3. Compare (e.g., actual vs. target).
  4. Take action (e.g., train staff if slow).

Real-World Example: NTC’s Customer Complaint System NTC uses controlling to:

  • Track complaints per call center agent.
  • Set a target resolution time (e.g., <24 hours).
  • Reward agents who exceed targets.

E. Staffing: The Right People in the Right Roles

Definition: Recruiting, selecting, training, and retaining employees. In hospitality, turnover is high, so staffing is critical.

Key Staffing Challenges in Nepal:

  • Seasonal demand (e.g., peak in Dashain, slow in monsoon).
  • High attrition (e.g., hotel staff leaving for better pay).
  • Skill gaps (e.g., lack of trained sommeliers).

Worked Example: Daraz’s Warehouse Staffing Daraz uses staffing to:

  • Hire temporary workers during sales (e.g., 11.11).
  • Train staff on inventory management.
  • Use performance bonuses to retain top pickers.

2. Major Management Theories: Which One Fits Your Hotel?

No single theory works for all businesses. Here’s how classical, scientific, and contingency theories apply to Nepali hospitality.

A. Classical Management Theory (Fayol’s 14 Principles)

Who? Henri Fayol (1916) – Focused on universal principles for all organizations.

Key Principles Applied to Hotels:

Principle Hotel Example
Division of Work Front desk vs. housekeeping – specialized roles.
Unity of Command A waiter reports to only one F&B manager.
Scalar Chain Clear hierarchy: Guest → Bellboy → Front Desk → Manager → GM.
Espirit de Corps Team-building events (e.g., hotel sports day).
Order Uniforms, assigned tasks (e.g., room service trays labeled by guest name).

Advantages: ✅ Clear structure → less confusion. ✅ Works well in stable environments (e.g., luxury hotels).

Disadvantages: ❌ Rigid – doesn’t adapt to rapid changes (e.g., COVID-19 lockdowns). ❌ Ignores employee morale – can lead to burnout.

B. Scientific Management (Taylor’s Approach)

Who? Frederick W. Taylor (1911) – Focused on efficiency through standardization.

Key Ideas:

  1. Time-Motion Studies: Break tasks into smallest steps to find the fastest method.
  2. Standardized Tools: Use the same equipment for the same job.
  3. Training & Incentives: Pay workers more for higher productivity.

Worked Example: Nepal Bank’s Teller Efficiency Nepal Bank applies scientific management to:

  • Standardize transaction times (e.g., <2 mins per loan inquiry).
  • Train tellers on the fastest keypad shortcuts.
  • Reward top performers with bonuses.

Advantages: ✅ Increases productivity (e.g., more loans processed per hour). ✅ Reduces costs (e.g., less overtime).

Disadvantages: ❌ Repetitive work → boredom (e.g., hotel bellboys doing the same tasks). ❌ Ignores creativity (e.g., chefs prefer flexibility).

C. Contingency Theory: "It Depends!"

Who? Joan Woodward, Tom Burns – No one-size-fits-all approach.

Core Idea: The best management style depends on the situation.

Factors Affecting Choice:

Factor Example in Hospitality
Organization Size Small dhaba (autocratic) vs. Marriott (democratic).
Technology Use eSewa (digital, flexible) vs. traditional bank (structured).
Environment Earthquake-prone Nepal → contingency plans needed.
Employee Skills Experienced chefs (laissez-faire) vs. trainees (close supervision).

Worked Example: Hotel Yak & Yeti’s Adaptation

  • Peak season (Dashain): Autocratic (strict schedules, more staff).
  • Off-season (monsoon): Democratic (flexible hours, team input on promotions).
  • Crisis (earthquake): Contingency plan (evacuation drills, backup generators).

Advantages: ✅ Flexible – adapts to changes. ✅ Better decision-making (e.g., choosing between Fayol and Taylor).

Disadvantages: ❌ Complex – requires constant analysis. ❌ Hard to implement in fast-paced environments.

Visual Comparison:

Theory Best For Example in Nepal Weakness
Classical (Fayol) Large, stable hotels (e.g., Marriott) Clear hierarchy, uniform policies. Inflexible for crises.
Scientific (Taylor) Repetitive tasks (e.g., bank tellers) Standardized loan processing. Low job satisfaction.
Contingency Dynamic environments (e.g., eSewa) Adapts to digital trends, disasters. Requires expert analysis.

3. Emerging Challenges in Hospitality Management

Management isn’t static—new challenges are reshaping hotels, restaurants, and service industries. Here’s what Nepali hospitality must prepare for:

A. Digital Disruption (AI, Chatbots, Big Data)

Examples:

  • WhatsApp chatbots (e.g., Hotel Everest’s instant booking).
  • AI-driven recommendations (e.g., Marriott’s personalized stays).
  • Big Data for demand forecasting (e.g., eSewa predicting transaction spikes).

Challenge for Nepal:

  • High internet costs → limited adoption in rural hotels.
  • Lack of digital literacy among staff.

Solution:

  • Train staff on AI tools (e.g., chatbot customer service).
  • Partner with IT firms (e.g., Ncell’s digital payment integration).

B. Sustainability & Eco-Friendly Practices

Examples:

  • Eco-lodges in Annapurna (solar power, waste recycling).
  • Nepal Tourism Board’s "Green Hotel" certification.
  • Daraz’s plastic-free packaging.

Challenge for Nepal:

  • High operational costs (e.g., solar panels in remote areas).
  • Guest resistance (e.g., not reusing towels).

Solution:

  • Government subsidies for green hotels.
  • Educate guests (e.g., "Save water: Shorter showers" signs).

C. Cultural Diversity & Inclusivity

Examples:

  • International tourists in Kathmandu (different expectations).
  • Nepali hotels hiring foreign chefs (e.g., Italian pasta makers).
  • LGBTQ+ friendly policies (e.g., Hotel Yak’s inclusive training).

Challenge for Nepal:

  • Language barriers (e.g., English-only menus).
  • Cultural misunderstandings (e.g., vegetarian vs. non-veg guests).

Solution:

  • Multilingual staff (e.g., Mandarin, Hindi, English).
  • Cultural sensitivity training.

D. Workforce Shortages & High Turnover

Examples:

  • Hotels struggle to hire chefs (low salaries).
  • Housekeeping staff leave for better jobs (e.g., retail in Thamel).
  • Seasonal layoffs (e.g., monsoon slowdowns).

Challenge for Nepal:

  • Competition with other industries (e.g., construction, IT).
  • Lack of vocational training for hospitality.

Solution:

  • Better wages & benefits (e.g., performance bonuses).
  • Partnerships with colleges (e.g., BHM students for internships).

4. Worked Example: Managing a Kathmandu Hotel’s Breakfast Service

Let’s apply management principles to a real scenario: Hotel Everest’s breakfast rush.

Scenario:

  • Peak time: 7–9 AM (100+ guests).
  • Issues:
    • Long queues at the buffet.
    • Slow coffee service.
    • Wasted food (uneaten pastries).

Step-by-Step Management Solution:

Function Action Theory Applied
Planning Predict 120 guests based on past data. Allocate 3 extra waiters. Classical (Fayol’s forecasting)
Organizing Assign zones: Coffee → Pastries → Fruit → Seating. Scientific (Taylor’s division of labor)
Leading Motivate staff with a bonus for fast service. Democratic leadership
Controlling Measure: Time per guest served (target: <3 mins). PDCA Cycle
Staffing Train new waiters on efficient tray handling. Contingency (adapting to demand)

Result: ✅ Reduced wait time from 10 mins → 2 mins. ✅ Less food waste (better portion control). ✅ Higher guest satisfaction (→ better reviews on TripAdvisor).


5. In the Real World

Management theories aren’t just textbook ideas—they power the businesses you use daily. Here’s how Nepali and global companies apply them:

Example 1: eSewa – Contingency Theory in Action

  • Challenge: Peak transaction times (e.g., after salary days).
  • Solution:
    • Classical (Fayol): Clear hierarchy (customer → agent → supervisor → IT team).
    • Scientific (Taylor): Standardized scripts for common issues (e.g., "Your transaction failed. Retry in 5 mins.").
    • Contingency: Hires temporary agents during bonus season.
  • Result: 95% issue resolution in <24 hours.

Example 2: Marriott International – Fayol’s Principles Globally

  • Division of Work: Front desk, housekeeping, F&B are separate departments.
  • Unity of Command: A guest complains → front desk → manager → GM.
  • Espirit de Corps: Team-building retreats for managers.
  • Order: Uniforms, color-coded badges (e.g., red for security).

Example 3: Daraz – Scientific Management in Logistics

  • Time-Motion Studies: Optimized picker routes in warehouses (e.g., "Pick items in order of shelf location").
  • Standardized Tools: Same barcode scanners for all staff.
  • Incentives: Bonuses for fastest pickers (→ 30% productivity increase).

Example 4: NTC – Controlling for Customer Satisfaction

  • Set Standard: 90% complaints resolved in 24 hours.
  • Measure: Track calls per agent (target: <50 calls/day).
  • Compare: Actual vs. target (e.g., Agent A: 45 calls, Agent B: 60 calls).
  • Act: Train Agent B or reassign workload.

6. Exam Tip: How to Score Full Marks

This unit is conceptual but applied—examiners want theories + real-world links. Here’s how to ace your exam:

Do’s:

✔ Define the theory first, then apply it to hospitality.

  • Bad: "Contingency theory is flexible."
  • Good: "Contingency theory states that management style depends on the situation. For example, Hotel Yak & Yeti uses autocratic leadership during peak season but democratic in off-season."

✔ Use Nepali examples (e.g., eSewa, Daraz, Marriott, NTC). ✔ Draw diagrams (e.g., POLCS flowchart, Fayol’s principles table). ✔ Compare theories in a table (as shown above).

Don’ts:

❌ Just list points without explanation or examples. ❌ Ignore the hospitality context (e.g., talking about factories instead of hotels). ❌ Memorize without understanding (examiners check application, not rote learning).

Sample Exam Answer (10 Marks):

Question: "Describe the contingency theory of management and explain how a Nepali hotel can apply it."

Model Answer: The contingency theory (Woodward, Burns) states that there is no single best way to manage—the most effective approach depends on the situation. Unlike Fayol’s classical theory (which assumes universal principles) or Taylor’s scientific management (which focuses on efficiency), contingency theory adapts strategies to organizational context, environment, and employee skills.

Application in a Nepali Hotel (e.g., Hotel Everest):

  1. Peak Season (Dashain):

    • Autocratic leadership: Strict schedules, more staff, clear roles (Fayol’s unity of command).
    • Scientific management: Standardized breakfast service (e.g., buffet zones, timed refills).
  2. Off-Season (Monsoon):

    • Democratic leadership: Team input on promotions (e.g., "Rainy-day spa packages").
    • Laissez-faire for experienced staff: Chefs choose daily specials.
  3. Crisis (Earthquake):

    • Contingency plan: Evacuation drills, backup generators (Taylor’s preparedness).

Advantages for Nepal:

  • Flexibility: Adapts to seasonal demand.
  • Employee satisfaction: Morale improves with adaptive leadership.
  • Cost-effective: Reduces overtime in off-seasons.

Visual Aid:

flowchart LR
    A["Contingency Theory"] --> B["Situational Factors"]
    B --> C["Organization Size\n(Small dhaba vs. Marriott)"]
    B --> D["Technology\n(eSewa vs. traditional bank)"]
    B --> E["Environment\n(Earthquake vs. peak season)"]
    B --> F["Employee Skills\n(Trainees vs. experienced staff)"]
    A --> G["Adaptive Management\nAutocratic/Democratic/Laissez-Faire"]

Final Tip: Practice with past papers—notice how applied questions (e.g., "How does Daraz use management theories?") are worth more than definition-only answers. Use real examples to stand out!

Based on the TU BHM syllabus for Hotel French (BHM101), unit 4.

Discussion

Loading…