Strategic ManagementUnit 811 min read
Strategy Implementation: Structures, Systems, Culture & Change
Unit 8 of Strategic Management explores how organizations translate strategic plans into action through structure, systems, culture, and change management—covering organizational design, leadership, resource allocation, and overcoming resistance, with real-world examples from Nepali and global hospitality firms.
TAKEAWAYS:
- Strategy implementation requires aligning organizational structure, systems, and culture with strategic goals (e.g., a 5-star hotel’s flat structure vs. a franchise’s centralized control).
- Leadership styles (transformational vs. transactional) directly impact employee motivation and strategy execution (e.g., Marriott’s servant leadership vs. a Nepali guesthouse’s autocratic owner).
- Resource allocation (budgeting, technology, talent) must prioritize strategic initiatives (e.g., Nabil Bank’s digital transformation vs. a local lodge’s limited renovation funds).
- Overcoming resistance to change uses Kotter’s 8-step model (e.g., Daraz’s shift from e-commerce to logistics hubs faced employee pushback).
- Control systems (balanced scorecards, audits) measure progress (e.g., Himalayan Java’s monthly customer satisfaction surveys).
- Global vs. local implementation differs due to cultural norms (e.g., Toyota’s lean manufacturing in Nepal vs. Japan).
1. Defining Strategy Implementation
Strategy implementation is the process of translating strategic plans into action through resource allocation, organizational structure, and leadership. It bridges the gap between what an organization wants to achieve (strategy) and how it achieves it (execution). For hospitality businesses, this means:
- Aligning departments (front desk, kitchen, housekeeping) to deliver guest experiences.
- Deploying technology (e.g., eSewa’s payment integration in hotels).
- Training staff to meet new service standards.
Why it matters: Even the best strategy fails without execution. For example, a boutique hotel in Pokhara might plan to offer "luxury eco-stays" but fail if staff lack training in sustainable practices.
2. Organizational Structure and Strategy
Organizational structure determines how work is divided, coordinated, and controlled. The choice depends on strategy:
Types of Structures
mindmap
root((Organizational Structures))
Functional["Functional (e.g., Marriott: HR, F&B, Rooms)"]
Pros["Specialization, clear roles"]
Cons["Slow cross-department coordination"]
Divisional["Divisional (e.g., Chaudhary Group: hotels, retail, manufacturing)"]
Pros["Focused on product/market"]
Cons["Duplication of resources"]
Matrix["Matrix (e.g., global hotel chains: project + function teams)"]
Pros["Flexibility, innovation"]
Cons["Complexity, conflict"]
Network["Network (e.g., Airbnb + local hosts)"]
Pros["Scalability, cost-efficient"]
Cons["Less control over quality"]
Flat["Flat (e.g., small Nepali guesthouses)"]
Pros["Fast communication"]
Cons["Overworked managers"]Worked Example: Nabil Bank’s Digital Transformation
- Structure Shift: From hierarchical to agile teams for fintech (e.g., Nabil eBanking).
- Result: Faster loan processing and mobile banking adoption.
- Challenge: Resistance from traditional branch managers.
3. Systems and Processes
Systems are the procedures, policies, and technologies that enable strategy. Key systems in hospitality:
- Operational Systems: Reservation software (e.g., Amadeus), POS systems (e.g., Toast for restaurants).
- Control Systems: Budgeting, audits, customer feedback (e.g., TripAdvisor reviews).
- Innovation Systems: R&D for new services (e.g., Google’s AI-powered hotel concierge).
Comparison Table: Operational vs. Control Systems
| System Type | Purpose | Example in Hospitality | Risk if Poorly Implemented |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational | Daily execution of strategy | Kitchen inventory management | Food waste, delays |
| Control | Monitoring performance | Monthly revenue per room (RevPAR) | Budget overruns, guest dissatisfaction |
| Innovation | Future growth | Virtual reality tours for hotels | High costs, low ROI |
Real-World Link: Pathao’s Delivery System
- Strategy: Expand beyond food to groceries and parcels.
- System Change: Partnered with local logistics hubs (e.g., Daraz warehouses) to reduce delivery time.
- Result: 30% faster service in Kathmandu.
4. Leadership and Culture
Leadership Style influences how strategies are executed:
flowchart TD A["Leadership Styles"] --> B["Transformational"] A --> C["Transactional"] A --> D["Servant"] B --> B1["Inspires change (e.g., Ritz-Carlton’s ‘Ladies and Gentlemen Serving Ladies and Gentlemen’)"] C --> C1["Rewards performance (e.g., commission for hotel staff)"] D --> D1["Prioritizes employee growth (e.g., Himalayan Java’s training programs)"]
Culture is the shared values and behaviors that drive implementation. For example:
- Toyota’s Culture: "Respect for people" → Empowers employees to stop production lines (kaizen).
- Nepali Guesthouse Culture: Often family-run, leading to informal decision-making.
Worked Example: Marriott’s Culture of Service
- Strategy: Global consistency in service quality.
- Implementation:
- Training: "Crew Academy" for all staff.
- Culture: "Ownership mindset" (e.g., housekeeping reports directly to GM).
- Result: Consistently ranked #1 in guest satisfaction.
5. Resource Allocation
Resources include financial, human, and technological assets. Prioritization depends on strategy:
- Capital-Intensive Strategies (e.g., building a new hotel) require debt financing or investors.
- People-Intensive Strategies (e.g., luxury spas) need training and retention programs.
- Tech-Driven Strategies (e.g., smart rooms) demand R&D investment.
Worked Example: Daraz’s Logistics Hubs
- Strategy: Reduce delivery time in Nepal.
- Resource Allocation:
- Financial: $50M investment in warehouses.
- Human: Hired 5,000 local delivery agents.
- Technological: GPS tracking for parcels.
- Result: 2-day delivery across Nepal (vs. 5+ days previously).
6. Overcoming Resistance to Change
Change is inevitable in strategy implementation. Kotter’s 8-Step Model helps manage resistance:
flowchart TD A["1. Create Urgency"] --> B["2. Build Coalition"] B --> C["3. Develop Vision"] C --> D["4. Communicate Vision"] D --> E["5. Empower Action"] E --> F["6. Generate Short-Term Wins"] F --> G["7. Consolidate Gains"] G --> H["8. Anchor in Culture"]
Case Study: NTC’s Fiber Optic Expansion
- Change: Shift from copper to fiber broadband.
- Resistance: Employees feared job losses; customers doubted reliability.
- Solution:
- Step 4: Town halls with engineers explaining benefits.
- Step 6: Pilot in Kathmandu (fast adoption → reduced skepticism).
- Result: 70% fiber coverage in 3 years.
7. Control and Evaluation
Control systems monitor progress and correct deviations. Common tools:
- Balanced Scorecard: Measures financial, customer, internal process, and learning/growth metrics.
- Audits: Internal (e.g., hotel hygiene checks) or external (e.g., ISO certification).
- Benchmarking: Compare against competitors (e.g., occupancy rates vs. Hyatt).
Worked Example: Himalayan Java’s Monthly Reviews
- Metric: Customer satisfaction score (CSAT).
- Action: If CSAT drops, retrain baristas on coffee-making techniques.
- Result: CSAT improved from 78% to 92% in 6 months.
Comparison Table: Control Tools
| Tool | When to Use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced Scorecard | Long-term strategy tracking | Marriott’s global performance dashboard |
| Audits | Compliance or post-change evaluation | Nepal Health Tourist Board’s safety audits |
| Benchmarking | Competitive positioning | Comparing RevPAR of Thamalley Resort vs. peers |
8. Global vs. Local Implementation Challenges
| Factor | Global Implementation | Local Implementation (Nepali Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Culture | Standardized (e.g., McDonald’s) | Adapted (e.g., vegetarian options in Nepal) |
| Regulations | Complex (e.g., EU labor laws) | Bureaucratic (e.g., NTA licenses) |
| Technology Access | High (e.g., Google’s AI tools) | Limited (e.g., rural hotels with dial-up) |
| Leadership Style | Often hierarchical (e.g., Accor) | Often familial (e.g., Thamalley Group) |
Case Study: Starbucks in Nepal
- Global Strategy: Premium coffee experience.
- Local Adaptation:
- Menu: Added masala chai and sel roti to appeal to Nepali tastes.
- Pricing: Lower than global averages due to cost constraints.
- Challenge: Supply chain delays for imported beans.
In the Real World
eSewa’s Payment Integration in Hotels
- Idea Used: System Implementation (operational system).
- How: Hotels like Hotel Yak & Yeti integrated eSewa for online bookings and payments, reducing cash handling and fraud. The system required training staff on digital transactions and upgrading POS terminals.
Pathao’s Driver Incentives
- Idea Used: Resource Allocation + Leadership.
- How: Pathao used performance-based bonuses (transactional leadership) to motivate drivers during peak hours. They also empowered local captains (servant leadership) to resolve delivery issues, reducing customer complaints by 40%.
Nabil Bank’s Digital Loan Processing
- Idea Used: Structure + Control Systems.
- How: Nabil shifted from branch-based loan approvals to a centralized digital hub with AI risk assessment. This required:
- Flattening hierarchy (branch managers lost some authority).
- Monthly audits to ensure compliance with new digital policies.
- Result: Loan processing time dropped from 15 days to 2 hours.
Exam Tip
Structure Your Answer:
- Start with a definition of strategy implementation.
- Use a bulleted framework (e.g., "To implement Strategy X, Company Y did A, B, and C").
- Compare global vs. local examples (e.g., "While Marriott uses a matrix structure globally, a Nepali guesthouse relies on a flat structure due to...").
Use Real-World Examples:
- Nepal: Nabil Bank, Daraz, Himalayan Java, Thamalley Resort.
- Global: Starbucks, Toyota, Marriott, Airbnb.
- Link theories to examples:
- "Like Kotter’s Step 3, Daraz developed a vision of ‘1-hour delivery’ to overcome employee resistance."
Diagrams Are Your Friends:
- Draw organizational structures (e.g., functional vs. divisional).
- Use flowcharts for processes (e.g., Kotter’s model, control systems).
- Tables for comparisons (e.g., global vs. local challenges).
Common Pitfalls to Avoid:
- ❌ Vague answers: Instead of "culture is important," say "Himalayan Java’s culture of ‘employee-first’ training reduced turnover by 20%."
- ❌ Ignoring resistance: Always mention how a company overcame pushback (e.g., NTC’s town halls).
- ❌ Assuming one-size-fits-all: Explain why a structure/system works for one company but not another (e.g., Toyota’s lean manufacturing vs. a Nepali lodge’s limited resources).
Exam Questions to Practice:
- "How would you implement a ‘sustainability strategy’ in a 3-star hotel in Pokhara?" (Hint: Structure → eco-friendly teams; Systems → composting programs; Culture → staff incentives.)
- "Compare the implementation challenges of a global chain (e.g., Accor) vs. a local guesthouse in Nepal." (Hint: Use the comparison table above.)
Based on the TU BHM syllabus for Strategic Management (MGT312), unit 8.
Discussion
Loading…